ArticleBMC health services research2025
Geriatric assessment in Belgian nursing homes: qualitative insights.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Avoidable emergency department admissions among nursing home residents - insights from a retrospective study.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNursing home residents (NHR) have complex health needs due to their multimorbidity and frailty, challenging interorganisational collaboration, particularly between nursing homes (NH) and hospitals. Coronavirus disease pandemic highlighted the need to strengthen the expertise of NHs care teams. Geriatric mobile teams (GMT) exist in several countries and aim to provide interdisciplinary advice to reinforce the primary care expertise. To develop GMTs in Belgium, we chose a participatory and systemic approach. The aim focuses on identifying areas of partnership between hospitals and NHs based on the geriatric needs of residents, from the perspective of the stakeholders involved in their care. Additionally, it examines the essential requirements for fostering collaboration among these stakeholders.
methodQualitative study using semi-structured interviews of 20 healthcare professionals working in a Belgian academic hospital or within its affiliated NH network. Themes were extracted using thematic analysis, employing simultaneously an inductive approach for the partnership areas and a deductive approach constructed around Karam's framework of interorganizational and interprofessional collaboration.
resultsParticipants highlighted the increasing complexity of NHRs' healthcare needs and the crucial role of geriatric expertise in managing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, assessing complex medical situations, and advance care planning. While all supported enhanced collaboration, key challenges included formalizing processes and facilitating care integration between providers. Balancing high-level care with the risk of over-medicalization also remains a critical issue. These findings are reflected in three main themes: empowering nursing homes with geriatric expertise; The high importance of integration and formalisation; and balancing tension between a place of residence and high skilled care.
conclusionThis study provides a comprehensive overview of expected collaboration areas and practical strategies to manage constraints. By using a qualitative approach, we integrated the perspectives of all key stakeholders, ensuring that proposed initiatives align with actual needs. Strengthening collaboration between NHs and geriatric services requires formalized frameworks and co-designed protocols with frontline caregivers. Such an initiative has the potential to dismantle compartmentalized care pathways for NHRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.