ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2025
Is the ischemia found in normal pressure hydrocephalus secondary to venous compression or arterial constriction? A comment on Ohmura et al.
Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endovascular approaches to neural interfacing: lessons from cardiovascular technologies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- A Lumped Parameter Modelling Study of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Suggests the CSF Formation Rate Varies with the Capillary Transmural Pressure.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn a recent study of normal pressure hydrocephalus published by Ohmura et al., there was a progressive reduction in the cerebral blood volume within the cortex, as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy, following an increase in the intracranial pressure from an infusion study. The authors contend that this reduction in blood volume occurred due to the collapse of the venous structures, starting from the smallest veins adjacent to the capillaries and involving the entire venous outflow tract. We wish to outline some problems with this interpretation. MAIN BODY: It has been previously shown that venous collapse secondary to an increase in intracranial pressure always starts at the most distal point in the veins. The critical buckling pressure for a tube depends on the cube of the ratio of the wall thickness and the internal diameter. The smallest veins have ratios which are larger than the distal cortical veins, so the latter are the ones to collapse first. The collapse of the distal venous outflow cuff always leads to an increase in the transmural pressure of the veins upstream from it, leading to venous dilatation and not a reduction in venous volume. Only a simultaneous arteriolar constriction of a greater volume than the venous volume increase can account for the progressive reduction in blood volume, which occurs once the ICP is greater than the sinus outflow pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus.
conclusionsThe reduction in cerebral blood volume which occurs in the cortex in normal pressure hydrocephalus cannot be due to widespread venous collapse. Therefore, there must be a large component of arteriolar constriction accompanying this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.