ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Learning curve for full-endoscopic lumbar decompression via interlaminar approach using the learning curve cumulative summation analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of arthroscopic experience on the learning curve in interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a single-center prospective cohort study of 240 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Observational
- Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Biochemical Markers Following Tubular Microscopic Discectomy Versus Full Endoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Hidden Blood Loss in Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Compared with Biportal Endoscopic and Open Microscopic Surgery for Single-Segment Lumbar Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Learning curve in full-endoscopic lumbar surgery for disc herniation in a spine clinic in Mexico: Comparative analysis of IELD and TELD techniques.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Assisted full-endoscopic spine surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: Technical note and learning curve.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression for two-level adjacent lumbar spinal stenosis through a single sliding approach: technical report and early follow-up.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFull-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) is generally considered to have a steep learning curve due to its technical complexity. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for full-endoscopic decompressive laminectomy via the interlaminar approach using learning curve cumulative summation test (LC-CUSUM) analysis, which provides objective statistical monitoring of surgical competency acquisition, and determine the number of cases required for surgical competency.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the first 60 consecutive patients who underwent single-level interlaminar endoscopic unilateral lumbar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis performed by a single surgeon with 4 years of experience. LC-CUSUM analysis was employed with operative time as the primary outcome measure. The target time was set at 80 min, based on the same surgeon's mean operative time for microscopic laminectomy. The patients were divided into the early (≤ 30 cases) and late (> 30 cases) learning periods and compared.
resultsLC-CUSUM analysis revealed that competency was achieved after 51 cases. The mean operative time significantly decreased from 90.20 ± 24.44 min in the early period to 71.47 ± 16.65 min in the late period (p = 0.001). Estimated blood loss showed significant reduction (54.83 ± 42.58 ml vs. 34.83 ± 19.10 ml, p = 0.024). Complication rates remained consistent between periods (10% each), with similar rates of dural tears (6.67% in both periods).
conclusionsThe results of this study have demonstrated that a learning period of 51 cases could be required to achieve proficiency in full-endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression. However, the procedure can be safely performed even during the early learning period by surgeons with adequate microscopic surgical experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.