ArticleBMC public health2025
The role of social determinants of health in woman's intention to pregnancy: a model with the mediation of social support.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation and validation of the Korean version of the Fertility Intention Scale in breast cancer survivors.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Exploring the reasons behind induced abortion among Iranian couples: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Association between family health and fertility intention among women of childbearing age in China: evidence from a large multi-stage cross-sectional survey.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the quality of life in pregnancy scale (PREG-QOL): a translation and validation study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Determinants of childbearing intention among Iranian women: Integrating psychological, demographic, and socioeconomic factors.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Pregnancy stress in women at high risk of preeclampsia with their anxiety, depression, self-management capacity: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Are you willing to forgive generative AI doctors? Trust repair after failures in online health consultation services.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildbearing intention is a complex issue that is influenced by a number of factor. However, childbearing intention does not necessarily lead to actual behavior, and mediating factors are effective in the realization and emergence of reproductive behavior. Since childbearing intention is influenced by several factors, including the social determinants of health, a thorough understanding of the effect of health determinants on this intention will help the reproductive process. Therefore, the present study was conducted using a social support-mediated model to examine the role of social determinants of health in women's intention to pregnant.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted on 500 married women of reproductive age (age range 15-49 years old) who were referred to health centers affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences during 2022-2023. Sampling was performed in a multi-stage (class-cluster) manner. Data collection tools in this study included the Demographic Information Form, the Childbearing Intention Questionnaire, social determinants of health questionnaires such as the Ghodratnama Socio-Economic Status Questionnaire, the Perceived Social Support Questionnaire, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21), and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spinner questionnaire). Data analysis was performed using SPSS21 software with descriptive statistical tests and analytical statistics. Laserl 8.8 software was also used to test the model using the path analysis statistical test.
resultsThe mean scores of depression, anxiety and stress were 5.03 ± 4.39, 4.49 ± 3.68 and 7.7 ± 4.67, respectively. The mean score of marital adjustment was 103.26 ± 23.49, indicating that the majority of women (60.4%) had marital adjustment. Based on the results of the path analysis, marital adjustment was the only variable that had a direct positive and significant causal relationship with the childbearing intention from only one path (B = 0.74). Moreover, based on the results of the path analysis, perceived social support had the most direct and indirect positive causal relationship with the childbearing intention to have children (B = 0.74). Among the components of DASS21, depression was the only variable that had both a direct and indirect negative causal relationship with childbearing (B=-0.12). Both stress and anxiety had a direct positive causal relationship with the childbearing intention (B = 0.11 and B = 0.15 respectively).
conclusionFactors such as marital adjustment, perceived social support, depression, stress, and anxiety, as structural social determinants of health, are associated with childbearing intention. Accordingly, changes in social structures depend on population planning and policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.