ArticleBMC oral health2025
Investigation of dental health and salivary microbiota characteristics of children with visual impairment in Guangzhou, China.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Health Status and Dental Needs in Individuals with Sensory Impairments: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Salivary microbiota composition and caries status in children with hearing impairment: a cross-sectional comparative study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Impact of Chemotherapy Alone and in Combination with Immunotherapy on Oral Microbiota in Cancer Patients-A Pilot Study.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of visual impairment (VS) among children in China is increasing. The oral microbiome is crucial for maintaining homeostasis and health. This study aimed to investigate the oral health and hygiene habits of children with VS in Guangzhou and explore the differences in salivary microbiota (SM) between children with VS and healthy vision (HS).
methodThis study included oral health examinations and surveys of oral hygiene habits among 101 children with VS. Saliva samples from 20 children with VS and 20 with HS were analysed for oral microbiota. The 16s rRNA V3-V4 regions were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform and operational taxonomic units were clustered using QIIME for statistical analysis.
resultsInadequate oral hygiene was observed among 101 children with VS, aged 6-16, who displayed a high caries rate of 92.1%. There was no significant difference in the overall composition of the salivary microbiota between the two groups. HS group had a higher abundance of Bacillota, Patescibacteria, and Spirochaetota at the phylum level; Bacilli, Negativicutes, and Saccharimonadia at the class level; and Streptococcus at the genus level. In contrast, VS group showed a greater abundance of Actinomycetota, Bacteroidota, Pseudomonadota, and Fusobacteriota (at the phylum level) and Actinomycetia, Bacteroidia, Gammaproteobacteria, Fusobacteriia, and Clostridia (at the class level), along with Rothia, Neisseria, Veillonella, Prevotella_7, Actinomyces, Leptotrichia, and Lactobacillales (at the genus level). Actinomycetota was significantly and positively correlated with gingivitis and dental caries, and Streptococcus salivarius was more abundant in children with VS.
conclusionThis study underscores the importance of improving oral healthcare for schoolchildren with VS in Guangzhou, China and provides valuable insights into the characteristics of the salivary microbiota of this population, identifying potential targets for interventions aimed at enhancing oral health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.