ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Predictive modeling of pregnancy outcomes utilizing multiple machine learning techniques for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A robust clinical-laboratory AI model for predicting cumulative live birth per oocyte retrieval as a benchmark for evaluating emerging embryo selection technologies.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2026Article
- Gut microbiota-derived butyrate and the SIRT1/FoxO1 axis: epigenetic-metabolic regulation of ovarian function in premature ovarian insufficiency-a comprehensive review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Review
- The Influencing Factors and Predictive Algorithm of Pregnancy Outcomes in IVF/ICSI-ET Patients.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Breaking barriers in male infertility: the power of artificial intelligence-driven solutions.Frontiers in urology · 2026Review
- Personal KPIs in IVF Laboratory: Are They Measurable or Distortable? A Case Study Using AI-Based Benchmarking.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- From the Understanding of Maternal Molecules and Mechanisms to Predicting Embryonic Development.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to investigate the influencing factors of pregnancy outcomes during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) procedures in clinical practice. Several prediction models were constructed to predict pregnancy outcomes and models with higher accuracy were identified for potential implementation in clinical settings.
methodsThe clinical data and pregnancy outcomes of 2625 women who underwent fresh cycles of IVF-ET between 2016 and 2022 at the Reproductive Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University were enrolled to establish a comprehensive dataset. The observed features were preprocessed and analyzed. A predictive model for pregnancy outcomes of IVF-ET treatment was constructed based on the processed data. The dataset was divided into a training set and a test set in an 8:2 ratio. Predictive models for clinical pregnancy and clinical live births were developed. The ROC curve was plotted, and the AUC was calculated and the prediction model with the highest accuracy rate was selected from multiple models. The key features and main aspects of IVF-ET treatment outcome prediction were further analyzed.
resultsThe clinical pregnancy outcome was categorized into pregnancy and live birth. The XGBoost model exhibited the highest AUC for predicting pregnancy, achieving a validated AUC of 0.999 (95% CI: 0.999-1.000). For predicting live births, the LightGBM model exhibited the highest AUC of 0.913 (95% CI: 0.895-0.930).
conclusionThe XGBoost model predicted the possibility of pregnancy with an accuracy of up to 0.999. While the LightGBM model predicted the possibility of live birth with an accuracy of up to 0.913.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.