Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108493›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Predicting low birth weight risks in pregnant women in Brazil using machine learning algorithms: data from the Araraquara cohort study.

Audêncio Victor, Francielly Almeida, Sancho Pedro Xavier, Patrícia H C Rondó

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Audêncio VictorSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Saúde Pública- USP Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715 - São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246904, Brazil. audenciovictor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-3639
Francielly AlmeidaFaculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto, FEA-RP/USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sancho Pedro XavierInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Mato Grosso. Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Patrícia H C RondóSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo (USP), Faculdade de Saúde Pública- USP Avenida Doutor Arnaldo, 715 - São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246904, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow birth weight (LBW) is a critical factor linked to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Early prediction is essential for timely interventions. This study aimed to develop and evaluate predictive models for LBW using machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, XGBoost, Catboost, and LightGBM.

methodsWe analyzed data from 1,579 pregnant women enrolled in the Araraquara Cohort, a population-based longitudinal study. Predictor variables included maternal sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral factors. Four ML algorithms Random Forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM, were trained using an 80/20 train-test split and 10-fold cross-validation. To address class imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), F1-score, and precision-recall. Variable importance was evaluated using Shapley values.

resultsXGBoost demonstrated the best performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.94, followed by CatBoost (0.94), Random Forest (0.94), and LightGBM (0.94). Maternal gestational age was the most influential predictor, followed by marital status and prenatal care frequency. Behavioral factors, such as physical activity, also contributed to LBW risk. Shapley analysis provided interpretable insights into variable contributions, supporting the clinical applicability of the models.

conclusionMachine learning, combined with SMOTE, proved to be an effective approach for predicting LBW. XGBoost stood out as the most accurate model, but Catboost and Random Forest also provided solid results. These models can be applied to identify high-risk pregnancies, improving perinatal outcomes through early interventions.

Indexed as

Infant, Low Birth WeightMachine LearningAdultAlgorithmsBrazilCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveYoung AdultAraraquara cohortLow birth weightMachine learningRandom forestXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40108493
PMCPMC11921654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.