ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Predicting low birth weight risks in pregnant women in Brazil using machine learning algorithms: data from the Araraquara cohort study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning models for predicting childhood anemia in Mozambique: analysis from national survey data.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling with machine learning for low birth weight in the state of São Paulo: a retrospective population-based study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow birth weight (LBW) is a critical factor linked to neonatal morbidity and mortality. Early prediction is essential for timely interventions. This study aimed to develop and evaluate predictive models for LBW using machine learning algorithms, including Random Forest, XGBoost, Catboost, and LightGBM.
methodsWe analyzed data from 1,579 pregnant women enrolled in the Araraquara Cohort, a population-based longitudinal study. Predictor variables included maternal sociodemographic, clinical, and behavioral factors. Four ML algorithms Random Forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, and LightGBM, were trained using an 80/20 train-test split and 10-fold cross-validation. To address class imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was applied. Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), F1-score, and precision-recall. Variable importance was evaluated using Shapley values.
resultsXGBoost demonstrated the best performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.94, followed by CatBoost (0.94), Random Forest (0.94), and LightGBM (0.94). Maternal gestational age was the most influential predictor, followed by marital status and prenatal care frequency. Behavioral factors, such as physical activity, also contributed to LBW risk. Shapley analysis provided interpretable insights into variable contributions, supporting the clinical applicability of the models.
conclusionMachine learning, combined with SMOTE, proved to be an effective approach for predicting LBW. XGBoost stood out as the most accurate model, but Catboost and Random Forest also provided solid results. These models can be applied to identify high-risk pregnancies, improving perinatal outcomes through early interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.