ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025
Hemodynamic precision to guide surgical timing for neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemodynamic Phenotypes in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Unresolved Questions and Future Directions.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Born under pressure: cardiac adaptation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- A hemodynamic-driven approach to chronic pulmonary hypertension in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Perioperative biventricular function in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a three-dimensional echocardiographic study.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Safety and Feasibility of Early Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography and a Focused Assessment Protocol in Neonates With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite a near universal approach focused on physiologic stabilization prior to surgical repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), a condition with significant morbidity and mortality, there remains a lack of consensus, or even guidance, on the appropriate timing for diaphragmatic reconstruction. Hemodynamic-directed care has increasingly been incorporated into the post-natal, peri-operative care of CDH, including assessments of pulmonary hypertension and ventricular dysfunction. Herein, we discuss the integration of targeted neonatal echocardiography and hemodynamic-based assessments to guide precision-directed care and inform selection of the optimal surgical repair window in this complex, heterogeneous patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40108476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.