ArticleScientific reports2025
Smart extrusion via data-driven prediction of grain size and peripheral coarse grain defect formation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimization of the mechanical and crash properties of extruded AA6XXX automotive profiles requires detailed understanding of grain size evolution and formation of the peripheral coarse grain (PCG) defect. Conventional approaches demand extensive experimental campaigns which, further to being lengthy and resource-intensive, often lead to the adoption of conservative process parameters that limit production efficiency. The present work proposes a data-driven method for predicting grain size and PCG formation, combining finite element method (FEM) simulation data with experimental microstructural observations to train machine learning (ML) algorithms for classification and regression. Over 22,000 data points were collected from two distinct AA6082 aluminum alloy profiles with different geometries, extruded over a range of different process conditions. Hyperparameter optimization of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for regression and prediction was performed, with ANN outcomes benchmarked against existing analytical models. PCG formation was predicted with 5.8% false negatives and 3.9% false positives compared to 10.1% and 18.1%, respectively, with existing analytical models, while grain size was predicted with a mean squared error (MSE) of 9.77 μm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.