ArticleScientific reports2025
Stroma and lymphocytes identified by deep learning are independent predictors for survival in pancreatic cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatially resolved tissue architecture and computational pathology in pancreatic cancer.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Digital quantification of stroma percentage enhances prognostic stratification in pancreatic cancer.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- Smart polymeric nanoparticles for targeted delivery and microenvironment-responsive therapy in pancreatic cancer.Smart materials in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers known to humans. However, not all patients fare equally poor survival, and a minority of patients even survives advanced disease for months or years. Thus, there is a clinical need to search corresponding prognostic biomarkers which forecast survival on an individual basis. To dig more information and identify potential biomarkers from PDAC pathological slides, we trained a deep learning (DL) model based U-net-shaped backbone. This DL model can automatically detect tumor, stroma and lymphocytes on whole slide images (WSIs) of PDAC patients. We performed an analysis of 800 PDAC scans, categorizing stroma in percentage (SIP) and lymphocytes in percentage (LIP) into two and three categories, respectively. The presented model achieved remarkable accuracy results with a total accuracy of 94.72%, a mean intersection of union rate of 78.66%, and a mean dice coefficient of 87.74%. Survival analysis revealed that SIP-mediate and LIP-high groups correlated with enhanced median overall survival (OS) across all cohorts. These findings underscore the potential of SIP and LIP as prognostic biomarkers for PDAC and highlight the utility of DL as a tool for PDAC biomarkers detecting on WSIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.