Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108342›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Interpretable personalized surgical recommendation with joint consideration of multiple decisional dimensions.

Zhe Du, Zhaoyang Liu, Linru Fu, Che Wang, Zhijing Sun, Lan Zhu, Ke Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhe Du *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, 100730, China.
Zhaoyang Liu *Department of Statistics & Data Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Linru Fu *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, 100730, China.
Che WangDepartment of Statistics & Data Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Zhijing SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, 100730, China. sunzhj2001@sina.com.
Lan ZhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, Beijing, 100730, China. zhu_julie@vip.sina.com.
Ke DengDepartment of Statistics & Data Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. kdeng@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4383-8319

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 12371269Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (Beijing Natural Science Foundation) No. Z190021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical planning can be highly complicated and personalized, where a surgeon needs to balance multiple decisional dimensions including surgical effectiveness, risk, cost, and patient's conditions and preferences. Turning to artificial intelligence is a great appeal. This study filled in this gap with Multi-Dimensional Recommendation (MUDI), an interpretable data-driven intelligent system that supported personalized surgical recommendations on both the patient's and the surgeon's side with joint consideration of multiple decisional dimensions. Applied to Pelvic Organ Prolapse, a common female disease with significant impacts on life quality, MUDI stood out from a crowd of competing methods and achieved excellent performance that was comparable to top urogynecologists, with a transparent process that made communications between surgeons and patients easier. Users showed a willingness to accept the recommendations and achieved higher accuracy with the aid of MUDI. Such a success indicated that MUDI had the potential to solve similar challenges in other situations.

Identifiers

PMID40108342
PMCPMC11923295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.