Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108338›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026

Evolution and innovation in urethroplasty: a comprehensive narrative review of graft types and surgical techniques.

Donato Cannoletta, Filippo Pederzoli, Christian Yepes, Pankaj Joshi, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Sanjay Kulkarni, Marco Bandini

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Donato CannolettaUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. donatocannoletta@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4612-2440
Filippo PederzoliUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3873-7465
Christian YepesCenter for Genital Reconstructive Surgery, Cali, Colombia.
Pankaj JoshiKulkarni Uro Surgery Institute, Pune, India.
Andrea SaloniaUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-7165
Alberto BrigantiUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Sanjay KulkarniKulkarni Uro Surgery Institute, Pune, India.
Marco BandiniUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urethroplasty has evolved over last decades, with significant improvements in surgical techniques and graft types. In this narrative review, we aimed to explore the evolution of urethroplasty techniques for bulbar urethral strictures. To do this, the review is structured into three main sections: the Historical Background section highlights the seminal contribution from early pioneers to contemporary techniques, which re-gained momentum in reconstructive urology. Starting with the early techniques in the 19th and 20th centuries, we focused on the pioneering innovations of the 1990s, ultimately leading to the most recent tissue-preserving techniques. The second part presents a literature review comparing different graft types and critically evaluating surgical outcomes from multiple original articles and meta-analysis. Specifically, similar success rates were reported for oral and preputial grafts for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures, while long-term outcomes suggest graft deterioration over time. Furthermore, data on optimal surgical techniques remain limited. Lastly, Future Perspectives address ongoing innovations, including new graft and flap combinations for complex strictures, emphasizing the continuous refinement of less invasive, tissue-preserving techniques.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresUrethraUrethral StrictureUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.