ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2026
Evolution and innovation in urethroplasty: a comprehensive narrative review of graft types and surgical techniques.
Review in International journal of impotence research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Crafting the graft: an umbrella review of long-term outcomes and complications for various graft usage in urethral reconstruction.BMC urology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urethroplasty has evolved over last decades, with significant improvements in surgical techniques and graft types. In this narrative review, we aimed to explore the evolution of urethroplasty techniques for bulbar urethral strictures. To do this, the review is structured into three main sections: the Historical Background section highlights the seminal contribution from early pioneers to contemporary techniques, which re-gained momentum in reconstructive urology. Starting with the early techniques in the 19th and 20th centuries, we focused on the pioneering innovations of the 1990s, ultimately leading to the most recent tissue-preserving techniques. The second part presents a literature review comparing different graft types and critically evaluating surgical outcomes from multiple original articles and meta-analysis. Specifically, similar success rates were reported for oral and preputial grafts for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures, while long-term outcomes suggest graft deterioration over time. Furthermore, data on optimal surgical techniques remain limited. Lastly, Future Perspectives address ongoing innovations, including new graft and flap combinations for complex strictures, emphasizing the continuous refinement of less invasive, tissue-preserving techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40108338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.