Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108337›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of impotence research2025

Empowering people affected by penile cancer: towards a model for supportive self-management.

Catherine Paterson, Wayne Earle, David Homewood, Justin Chee, Henry Yao, Shomik Sengupta, Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule, Reegan Knowles, Carolyn Ee, Theo Niyonsenga and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of impotence research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Catherine PatersonFlinders University, Caring Futures Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia. catherine.paterson@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-6782
Wayne EarleCheck Your Tackle, Consumer Not-for-Profit Organisation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David HomewoodDepartment of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Justin CheeDepartment of Urology, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Henry YaoEastern Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Shomik SenguptaEastern Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Oluwaseyifunmi Andi AgbejuleFlinders University, Caring Futures Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Reegan KnowlesFlinders University, Caring Futures Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Carolyn EeFlinders University, Caring Futures Institute, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Theo NiyonsengaFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Ian D DavisEastern Health Clinical School, Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-8244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvements in the quality of penile cancer management are difficult due to the rarity of the condition and a limited evidence base for treatment decisions. Penile cancer and some of its highly morbid treatments can cause profound psychosexual and physical effects that negatively impact quality of life. Multidisciplinary interventions are required to equip patients with the support necessary to manage their emotional, physical, work, and lifestyle challenges to optimize health, well-being, and recovery. This paper outlines a model of supported self-management, which is a novel model of care for people with penile cancer to mitigate disease and treatment morbidity.

Indexed as

Penile NeoplasmsSelf-ManagementHumansMaleQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID40108337
PMCPMC12474548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.