ArticleScientific reports2025
Toward real-time margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery with hyperspectral imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperspectral imaging and healthy aging: an observational study using hand skin as surface for monitoring healthy aging processes.Biogerontology · 2026Observational
- Redefining Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery: Surgeon-Performed Intraoperative Ultrasound as a Reliable Alternative to Radiologic and Mammographic Assessment.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- Review of shortwave infrared imaging and spectroscopy in tissue [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2025Review
- From Innovation to Application: Can Emerging Imaging Techniques Transform Breast Cancer Diagnosis?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Imaging Through Scattering Tissue Based on NIR Multispectral Image Fusion Technique.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery (BSC) remains a critical challenge, with 20-25% of cases resulting in inadequate tumor resection, increasing the risk of local recurrence and the need for additional treatment. In this study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) as a non-invasive technique for assessing resection margins in ex vivo lumpectomy specimens. A dataset of over 200 lumpectomy specimens was collected using two hyperspectral cameras, and a classification algorithm was developed to distinguish between healthy and tumor tissue within margins of 0 and 2 mm. The proposed approach achieved its highest diagnostic performance at a 0 mm margin, with a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 78%, accuracy of 83%, Matthews correlation coefficient of 68%, and an area under the curve of 89%. The entire resection surface could be imaged and evaluated within 10 minutes, providing a rapid and non-invasive alternative to conventional margin assessment techniques. These findings represent a significant advancement toward real-time intraoperative margin assessment, highlighting the potential of HSI to enhance surgical precision and reduce re-excision rates in BCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.