Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108280›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Toward real-time margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery with hyperspectral imaging.

Lynn-Jade S Jong, Dinusha Veluponnar, Freija Geldof, Joyce Sanders, Marcos Da Silva Guimaraes, Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters, Frederieke van Duijnhoven, Henricus J C M Sterenborg, Behdad Dashtbozorg, Theo J M Ruers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lynn-Jade S JongImage-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Dinusha VeluponnarImage-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Freija GeldofImage-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Joyce SandersDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Marcos Da Silva GuimaraesDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken PeetersImage-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Frederieke van DuijnhovenImage-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Henricus J C M SterenborgImage-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.
Behdad DashtbozorgImage-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands. b.dasht.bozorg@nki.nl.
Theo J M RuersImage-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, 1066 CX, The Netherlands.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 10747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery (BSC) remains a critical challenge, with 20-25% of cases resulting in inadequate tumor resection, increasing the risk of local recurrence and the need for additional treatment. In this study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of hyperspectral imaging (HSI) as a non-invasive technique for assessing resection margins in ex vivo lumpectomy specimens. A dataset of over 200 lumpectomy specimens was collected using two hyperspectral cameras, and a classification algorithm was developed to distinguish between healthy and tumor tissue within margins of 0 and 2 mm. The proposed approach achieved its highest diagnostic performance at a 0 mm margin, with a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 78%, accuracy of 83%, Matthews correlation coefficient of 68%, and an area under the curve of 89%. The entire resection surface could be imaged and evaluated within 10 minutes, providing a rapid and non-invasive alternative to conventional margin assessment techniques. These findings represent a significant advancement toward real-time intraoperative margin assessment, highlighting the potential of HSI to enhance surgical precision and reduce re-excision rates in BCS.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHyperspectral ImagingMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalAlgorithmsFemaleHumansBreast-conserving surgeryBreast tissueHyperspectral imagingResection margin assessmentTissue classification

Identifiers

PMID40108280
PMCPMC11923364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.