ArticleScientific reports2025
Modeling of sand-cultivated substrate for Gobi facility agriculture and validation of trenching test.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately simulating the interaction between trenching devices and river sand substrates is crucial for optimizing agricultural practices in Gobi Desert facility agriculture. This study calibrates Discrete Element Method (DEM) parameters for river sand substrate in the Gobi Desert of Northwest China, utilizing the Hertz-Mindlin contact model coupled with the Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) contact model in EDEM software. Key parameters, including stacking angle, particle size distribution, and morphology of the river sand, were measured using various methods and tools, such as an image acquisition system, vibration grading device, and stacking angle test apparatus. A model was developed to simulate the interaction between the river sand substrate and trenching device. The river sand matrix exhibited a stacking angle of 31.91°, with 9.85% of particles smaller than 0.25 mm, 52.60% ranging from 0.25 to 0.6 mm, and 37.55% exceeding 0.6 mm. A Plackett-Burman experimental design was employed to identify the sensitive parameters, including the static friction coefficient between river sand particles, the rolling friction coefficient of river sand and steel, and the restitution coefficient between river sands. The steepest ascent approach established the parameter ranges, and the Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used for optimization, resulting in the following parameter values: 0.533 for the static friction coefficient between river sand particles, 0.209 for the rolling friction coefficient of river sand and steel, and 0.213 for the coefficient of restitution between the river sand particles. A DEM model was developed based on these optimized parameters. Validation through experiments demonstrated that the simulation closely matched field test results, with errors in trench depth, surface width, and bottom width, all within a 9% margin of 8.8%, 4.8%, and 7.9%, respectively. These findings confirmed the accuracy and applicability of the DEM model for stimulating the interaction between river sand substrate and trenching equipment in Gobi Desert facility agriculture. This study provides a theoretical framework for optimizing trenching devices and rapidly constructing DEM models for river sand in sand farming systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.