ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive analysis of senescence-related genes identifies prognostic clusters with distinct characteristics in glioma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Senescence-associated gene signatures predict survival in lung cancer: a multi-cohort analysis.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Towards a personalized perspective on gliomas: an epigenetic-immuno-inflammatory aging framework.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Cellular senescence in cancer: from mechanism paradoxes to precision therapeutics.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellular senescence, defined as a state of permanent arrest in cell growth, is regarded as a crucial tumor suppression mechanism. However, accumulating scientific evidence suggests that senescent cells play a detrimental role in the progression of cancer. Unfortunately, the current lack of reliable markers that specifically reflect the level of senescence in cancer greatly hinders our in-depth understanding of this important biological foundation. Therefore, the search for more specific and reliable markers to reveal the specific role of senescent cells in cancer progression is particularly urgent and important. To uncover the role of senescence in gliomas, we collected senescence-related genes for integrated analysis. Consensus clustering was used to subtype gliomas based on the senescence gene set, and we identified two robust prognostic clusters of gliomas with distinct survival outcomes, multi-omics landscapes, immune characteristics, and differential drug responses. Multiple external datasets were used to validate the stability of our subtypes. Various computational and experimental methods, including WGCNA (Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis), ssGSEA (single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis), and machine learning algorithms (lasso regression, support vector machines, random forests), were employed for analysis. We found that CEBPB and LMNA are associated with poor prognosis in gliomas and may mediate immunosuppression and tumor proliferation. Drug prediction indicated that dasatinib is a potential therapeutic agent. Our findings provide insights into the role of the senescence gene set in patient stratification and precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.