ArticleScientific reports2025
Collecting initial accounts using ChatCharlie chatbot improves eyewitness memory in later investigative interviews.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Initial account interviews (IAi) offer eyewitnesses more immediate opportunities to answer a series of brief questions about their experiences prior to an in-depth, more formal investigative interview. An IAi is typically elicited in-person near/at the scene of a crime using broadly systematic questioning. Retrieval practice can improve subsequent recall in some contexts, but there is a dearth of research centred on the potential costs and benefits of a quick IAi. Furthermore, where an in-person IAi is impossible, no alternative quick provision exists. Given the systematic nature of the IAi protocol, we developed a conversational chatbot as a potential alternative. Using a mock-witness paradigm, we investigated the memory performance of adults from the general population during in-depth in-person interviews one week after having provided an IAi 10 min post event either (1) in person, (2) via the ChatCharlie chatbot, or (3) no IAi (control). IAi conditions leveraged significantly improved event recall during later investigative interviews versus the Control. Accounts were more accurate and complete, and more correct information was remembered without increased errors indicating the potential of digital agents for IAi purposes Findings concur with predictions from theoretical understanding of episodic memory consolidation and the empirical eyewitness literature regarding the benefits of practice in some contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.