ArticleScientific reports2025
A neuroadaptive interface shows intentional control alters the experience of time.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A reliable experience of time is critical for perception and action in the present, for accurately remembering our past, and for successfully planning a future. Theories of time perception commonly assume a central mechanism keeps time by providing a relatively independent, internal clock. Recent work, however, shows imaginary self-movements alter subjective time, suggesting a critical role for action in temporal cognition. To test the hypothesis that time perception derives from the relationship between action and perception, we designed a neuroadaptive interface operating on imaginary movement to visualize movement through virtual reality. EEG activity was classified online as reflecting accelerating movement or static imagery, which was then used in providing feedback for adapting the velocity of optical flow presented in a star field to enable neuroadaptive control. Two cybernetic experiments were conducted to determine how neuroadaptivity in the relation between action and perception affected temporal perception in the verbal time estimation task. In particularly, we contrasted neuroadaptive feedback (e.g. imagined running > visual acceleration) with non-adaptive (imagined standing > visual acceleration) and pseudoadaptive (sham) feedback conditions. Movement imagery biased estimated duration while intentional control increased judgements of the passage of time. We conclude that perception and imaginary action co-determine temporal cognition. Furthermore, the relationship between perception and action-our evaluation of perceived movement as intentionally produced-alters the subjective experience of time. Finally, we discuss the potential for our novel, neuroadaptive methodology as an investigative tool for temporal disturbances observed in psychopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.