ArticleScientific reports2025
Oculomotor learning is evident during implicit motor sequence learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oculomotor Dance Task: Implications for Audio-Visual-Cued Spatial Learning.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Task integration and anticipation in complex, continuous motor tasks.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor sequence learning involves both oculomotor and manual motor systems, yet the role of the oculomotor system in the learning and execution of skilled arm movements remains underexplored. In the current work, the influence of sequence learning on the oculomotor system was investigated by testing 20 healthy adults for 3 days as they practiced an implicit motor learning task, the serial targeting task (STT). The STT contained a repeated sequence, which was interleaved with random sequences. This task was practiced on a KINARM robot that tracked both saccades and reaches. A delayed, 24-h retention test assessed sequence-specific motor learning. Sequence-specific changes across practice and learning were observed for both saccades and reaches; this was demonstrated by faster saccade and arm motor reaction times for the repeated sequence compared to random sequences. Notably, change in the oculomotor system occurred earlier in practice as compared to the manual motor system. Reaches were executed more quickly when led by express saccades (rapid eye movements occurring within 90-120 ms) compared to when they were preceded by regular latency (> 120 ms) saccades early in practice. Our findings highlight distinct yet interconnected functions between oculomotor and manual motor systems associated with implicit motor sequence learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.