Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108196›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A study on the effects of different isokinetic testing modes of knee flexion-extension muscle strength ratios on lower extremity stiffness during jumping.

XingWei Si, Yaojia Liu, Xia Feng, Yan Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

XingWei SiCollege of Physical Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
Yaojia LiuCollege of Physical Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan, China. liuyaojia2022@163.com.
Xia FengCollege of Physical Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
Yan ShaoBeijing Sport University, Beijing, China.

Funding

the Return of Original Ecology of Central China's Martial Arts from the Perspective of Intangible Cultural Heritage 2023BTY017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between the knee flexion-extension strength ratio and lower limb stiffness at different movement speeds involves the interaction of biomechanics, neuromuscular control, and muscle physiology. The knee flexion-extension strength ratio reflects the balance of strength between the quadriceps and hamstrings, which typically varies across different movement speeds. Optimal lower extremity stiffness plays a crucial role in enhancing movement efficiency and preventing injuries. This study aims to investigate the influence of the knee flexion-extension strength ratio, assessed under different isokinetic testing conditions, on lower limb stiffness during jumping. By examining the relationship between strength characteristics and lower limb dynamic parameters, this study seeks to provide scientific evidence for optimizing athletic performance, injury prevention, and rehabilitation training. Fifty-five healthy male college students were selected as subjects. The knee flexion-extension muscle groups were tested at slow, medium, and fast speeds (60°/s, 150°/s, and 240°/s) using a Biodex isokinetic muscle strength tester to calculate the flexion-extension muscle strength ratios.High-speed cameras and a Kistler three-dimensional force platform were used to collect mechanical parameters related to the push-off and buffering phases of vertical jumps in place, and to calculate the vertical stiffness of the lower limbs.Variance analysis was employed to compare the differences in knee flexion-extension muscle strength ratios and lower extremity stiffness across different testing speed modes. The influence of different knee flexion-extension strength ratios on the peak vertical ground reaction force and the maximum vertical displacement of the center of mass showed significant differences. Specifically, comparisons between the high F/E ratio group and the low H1 group (P = 0.016), the high F/E ratio group and the low-to-moderate groups (P = 0.037), and the high F/E ratio group and the low group (P = 0.009) all demonstrated statistical significance (P < 0.05). Additionally, under different speed test conditions, the calculated lower limb vertical stiffness among different F/E ratio groups exhibited significant differences. The P-values for the significant differences among the slow (60°/s), moderate (150°/s), and fast (240°/s) speed groups were 0.018, 0.006, and 0.024, respectively. Under the same velocity mode, lower limb vertical stiffness during both the propulsion and absorption phases increases with a higher knee flexion-extension strength ratio (F/E). Across different velocity modes, the knee F/E ratio exhibits a general increasing trend with the acceleration of test speed among the low, medium, and high groups. This study is based on a specific isokinetic testing mode and jump task, without accounting for the effects of different movement contexts and individual variability. The causal relationship between muscle strength and jumping ability remains unclear. Therefore, future studies should adopt broader testing methodologies, such as integrating electromyography (EMG), biomechanical modeling, or longitudinal experiments, to further investigate the long-term effects of the flexion-extension strength ratio on lower limb stiffness and athletic performance.

Indexed as

KneeKnee JointLower ExtremityMuscle StrengthAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalRange of Motion, ArticularYoung AdultAthletic performanceIsokinetic strength testingLower limb propulsion and landing phasesVertical jump in place

Identifiers

PMID40108196
PMCPMC11923186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.