ArticleLight, science & applications2025
Nearfield control over magnetic light-matter interactions.
Article in Light, science & applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant Magnetic Purcell Effect Induced by High-Order Mie Resonances.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Self-Interfering Magnetic Dipole Transition Emission in Rare-Earth Ions Doped Nanoparticles Modulated by Plasmonic Mirror Nanocavity.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Achieving Maximum Chirality and Enhancing Third-Harmonic Generation via Quasi-Bound States in the Continuum in Nonlinear Metasurfaces.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Probing Optical Magnetic Dipole Transitions in EuACS photonics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Light-matter interactions are frequently perceived as predominantly influenced by the electric field, with the magnetic component of light often overlooked. Nonetheless, the magnetic field plays a pivotal role in various optical processes, including chiral light-matter interactions, photon-avalanching, and forbidden photochemistry, underscoring the significance of manipulating magnetic processes in optical phenomena. Here, we explore the ability to control the magnetic light and matter interactions at the nanoscale. In particular, we demonstrate experimentally, using a plasmonic nanostructure, the transfer of energy from the magnetic nearfield to a nanoparticle, thanks to the subwavelength magnetic confinement allowed by our nano-antenna. This control is made possible by the particular design of our plasmonic nanostructure, which has been optimized to spatially decouple the electric and magnetic components of localized plasmonic fields. Furthermore, by studying the spontaneous emission from the Lanthanide-ions doped nanoparticle, we observe that the measured field distributions are not spatially correlated with the experimentally estimated electric and magnetic local densities of states of this antenna, in contradiction with what would be expected from reciprocity. We demonstrate that this counter-intuitive observation is, in fact, the result of the different optical paths followed by the excitation and emission of the ions, which forbids a direct application of the reciprocity theorem.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.