Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108094›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2025

Prevalence and Patterns of Use of Natural Health Products and Medicines in New Zealand: A Pilot Study Using an Online Market Research Panel.

E Lyn Lee, Jeff Harrison, Joanne Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E Lyn LeeSchool of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3395-2414
Jeff HarrisonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8478-7469
Joanne BarnesSchool of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, 85 Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. j.barnes@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1522-8433

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand HRC Ref: 20/1246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional, complementary and alternative medicine (TCAM), including natural health products (NHPs), are used by many consumers to address their [perceived] health needs. While many developed countries have national data on NHPs use, limited information is available for New Zealand (NZ). Current, robust data on the prevalence and patterns of NHPs use in NZ are required.

objectiveThis project explored the feasibility of conducting a national study and collecting preliminary data on the prevalence and patterns of use of NHPs, including access to and expenditure on NHPs, and of the use of conventional medicines in NZ using a newly designed bespoke questionnaire.

methodsAn online cross-sectional survey was administered to a sample of the adult population in NZ via an online market research panel in November 2021. Self-reported data on participants' use of NHPs (including photographs of products), consultations with TCAM practitioners and use of conventional medicines were collected. Data on the prevalence and patterns of use of NHPs were analysed and reported using descriptive statistics. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the impact of sociodemographic variables on NHPs, TCAM practitioners and conventional medicines use.

resultsThe final sample comprised 992 participants. Sociodemographic data for these participants were comparable to those reported for the NZ Census 2018. The frequency of missing data was < 10% for most of the questions; data quality for broad-level prevalence analysis was good, but was moderate to poor for analysis at the specific NHP or TCAM practitioner level. The specific product(s) and their respective ingredient list(s) could not be determined for most NHPs described as photographs were not uploaded, rendering product names unverifiable. Preliminary data indicate that 57.6% of participants have used NHPs and 22.9% consulted a TCAM practitioner in the last 12 months. Among current NHP users, 71.1% concurrently used one or more conventional medicines. Over half (53%) of the NHPs were self-selected (not recommended by a health practitioner). The median daily cost per NHP was NZD 0.28 (interquartile range NZD 0.14-0.50) and the median cost for visits to a TCAM practitioner over the last 12 months was NZD 120 (interquartile range NZD 40-270). Female participants, younger individuals and conventional medicine users were more likely to use NHPs/consult a TCAM practitioner/use any TCAM. Higher-income participants were more inclined to consult a TCAM practitioner. Individuals born overseas were more likely to use any type of TCAM.

conclusionsThere was a high prevalence of use of NHPs and of consultations with TCAM practitioners, which may reflect the extent of use in the general NZ population. Recognising the potential impact on patients' health outcomes, there is a need for a larger and nationally representative dataset, preferably linkable to other health data collections, to validate these preliminary findings.

Identifiers

PMID40108094
PMCPMC12174004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.