Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108021›Full record

Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025

Addition of thalidomide for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in the second cycle after the failure of four-drug regimen in the first cycle.

Nishil Gowda, Mirunalini Ravichandran, Jeyaselvi Indrajithu, Tamizharasan Paninathan, Biswajit Dubashi, Smita Kayal, Prasanth Ganesan

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Olanzapine (10 mg vs 5 mg vs 2.5 mg) for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) - a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nishil GowdaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India.
Mirunalini RavichandranDepartment of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), JIPMER Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Jeyaselvi IndrajithuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India.
Tamizharasan PaninathanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India.
Biswajit DubashiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India.
Smita KayalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India.
Prasanth GanesanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, 605006, India. prasanth.g@jipmer.ac.in.

Funding

Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council BIRAC/BT/NBM0252/05/19Jawaharlal Institute Of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research JIP/Res/Intramural/phs 2 and 3/2021-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four-drug antiemetic prophylaxis achieves emesis control in 70-90% of patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). However, less than half achieve control of nausea. We added thalidomide to OAOD (ondansetron, aprepitant, dexamethasone, and olanzapine) to try and improve nausea control. Adults (> 18 years) who had failed ("any nausea" in 0-120 h after HEC) OAOD prophylaxis in cycle 1, were randomly assigned to thalidomide (T = 50 mg OD for 5 days) + OAOD or placebo (P) + OAOD in cycle 2. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving "no nausea" in 0-120 h from chemotherapy in the second cycle. A sample size of 50 (including dropouts) would be able to detect 30% "no nausea" in the T arm (β = 80%, α = 0.05). We enrolled 105 patients in cycle 1 and randomized 49 patients (25 thalidomide/ 24 placebo; median age 45(30-60) years; all anthracycline/ cyclophosphamide for breast cancer). The addition of thalidomide did not improve the proportion with "no nausea" in the overall (0-120 h) [T (16%) vs. P (21%); p = 0.72)], acute (0-24 h) (32% vs. 25%, p = 0.58), and delayed (24-72 h) (32% vs. 25%, p = 0.46) periods. Severe nausea (VAS ≥ 7) in the delayed period was reduced (T = 4% vs. P = 30%, p = 0.02). Sedation and dizziness were not increased, but mild constipation was higher with thalidomide [T (84%) vs. P (58%), p = 0.047)]. The addition of thalidomide to standard 4-drug CINV prophylaxis in cycle 2 did not improve nausea control among patients who "failed" the 4-drug regimen in cycle 1.Trial Registration: The trial was registered ( www.ctri.nic.in ; CTRI/2021/08/035980).

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNauseaThalidomideVomitingAdultBreast NeoplasmsDexamethasoneDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntiemeticsDexamethasoneThalidomideBreast cancerChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingComplete responseNauseaThalidomide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.