ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Influence of deep learning-based super-resolution reconstruction on Agatston score.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction Improves Image Quality of Dynamic Myocardial Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of deep learning-based super-resolution reconstruction (DLSRR) on image quality and Agatston score.
methodsConsecutive patients who underwent cardiac CT, including unenhanced CT for Agatston scoring, were enrolled. Four types of non-contrast CT images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and three strengths of DLSRR. Image quality was assessed by measuring image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the aorta, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and edge rise slope (ERS) of coronary artery calcium (CAC). Agatston score and CAC volume were also measured. These results were compared among the four CT datasets. Patients were categorized into four risk levels based on the Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS), and the concordance rate between FBP and DLSRR classifications was evaluated.
resultsFor the 111 patients enrolled, DLSRR significantly reduced image noise (p < 0.001) and improved SNR and CNR (p < 0.001), with stronger effects at higher DLSRR strengths (p < 0.01). ERS was significantly enhanced using DLSRR compared with FBP (p < 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference among the three strengths of DLSRR (p = 0.90-0.98). Agatston score and CAC volume were not significantly affected by DLSRR (p = 0.952 and 0.901, respectively). The concordance rate of CAC-DRS classification between FBP and DLSRR was 93%.
conclusionDLSRR significantly improves image quality by reducing noise and enhancing sharpness without significantly altering Agatston scores or CAC volumes. The concordance rate of CAC-DRS classification with FBP was high, although some reclassifications were observed. KEY POINTS: Question The utility of deep learning-based super-resolution reconstruction (DLSRR) in coronary CT angiography is well known, but its impact on the Agatston score remains unclear. Findings DLSRR significantly improved image quality without altering the Agatston scores, but some reclassifications of Coronary Artery Calcium Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) were observed. Clinical relevance DLSRR should be cautiously used in clinical settings owing to the occurrence of some cases of CAC-DRS reclassification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40108013What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.