ArticleProtoplasma2025
Morphoanatomical, histochemical, and molecular characterization of female Cannabis plants from three Argentine strains.
Article in Protoplasma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Back to the roots: Cannabis sativa L. root metabolism, microbiomes, and biotechnological potential.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Bacterial microbiota dynamics of Cannabis sativa L. under biotic stress induced by Tetranychus urticae.Protoplasma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study analyzed the morphoanatomical, histochemical, and molecular characteristics of three Cannabis sativa strains, CAT1, CAT2, and CAT3, acronyms for Argentine therapeutic strains in Spanish (Cepas Argentinas Terapéuticas), using bright light, fluorescence, and scanning electron microscopy. The strains were previously cultivated and chemically characterized at CIM, UNLP, CONICET. Five plants from each strain were collected at the end of the vegetative and flowering phases; part of the material was fixed for anatomical studies, and part was used fresh for histochemical analyses. Anatomical features of roots, stems, leaves, and flowers were analyzed, focusing on stomatal density, trichome types, and the presence of laticifers. Histochemical analyses detected phenolic compounds, cannabinoids, lipophilic compounds, and other metabolites using specific staining techniques. Additionally, short sequence repeat (SSR) molecular markers were employed to characterize and confirm the genomic identity of the strains. Morphoanatomical and histochemical traits enabled differentiation among the strains, revealing significant variations in leaflet dimensions, trichome density, and metabolic profiles. For example, CAT1 exhibited thicker leaves and larger stomata, CAT2 had a higher density of laticifers, and CAT3 showed a greater density of cannabinoid-rich glandular trichomes. Using SSR molecular markers, strain genomic identity was confirmed with a probability greater than 99.99999983%. This integrative approach, combining morphoanatomical, histochemical, and molecular analyses, highlights the unique features of CAT1, CAT2, and CAT3 and underscores the importance of molecular markers in validating strain identity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40108003What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.