ArticleBiological cybernetics2025
Optimal control for stochastic neural oscillators.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Magnitude-constrained optimal chaotic desynchronization of neural populations.Frontiers in network physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study develops an event-based, energy-efficient control strategy for desynchronizing coupled neuronal networks using optimal control theory. Inspired by phase resetting techniques in Parkinson's disease treatment, we incorporate stochasticity of the system's dynamics into deterministic models to address neural system intrinsic noise. We use an advanced computational solver for nonlinear stochastic partial differential equations to solve the stochastic Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation via level set methods for a single neuron model; this allows us to find control inputs which drive the dynamics close to the system's phaseless set. When applied to coupled neuronal networks, these inputs achieve effective randomization of neuronal spike timing, leading to significant network desynchronization. Compared to its deterministic counterpart, our stochastic method can achieve considerable energy savings. The event-based control minimizes unnecessary charge transfer, potentially extending implanted stimulator battery life while maintaining robustness against variations in neuronal coupling strengths and network heterogeneities. These findings highlight the potential for developing energy-efficient neurostimulation techniques with implications for deep brain stimulation protocols. The presented computational framework could also be applied to other domains for which stochastic optimal control problems are prevalent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.