ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025
Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Endometriosis Scars in Unusual Anatomic Locations.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cryoablation under local anesthesia: a promising treatment method for symptomatic adenomyosis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the pain relief and procedure-related outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (CA) of painful endometriosis deposits in unusual anatomic locations. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective search of institutional radiological information system identified a total of 15 patients (median age 35.5 years; interquartile ranges-IQR 33-38). Patients and lesions specific data as well as procedural and follow-up information were collected, analyzed, and presented using descriptive statistical methods.
resultsA total of 16 painful target lesions situated in the umbilicus (7/16; 43.8%), diaphragm (4/16; 25.0%), inguinal canal (3/16; 18.8%), and within the muscular layers of the uterus (i.e., adenomyosis; 2/16; 12.4%) underwent CA. The median of the largest diameter of the target lesions was 19 mm (IQR 13-22.3). Primary and secondary rates of complete pain relief were achieved in 86.7% (13/15 patients) and 93.3% (14/15 patients; one patient receiving additional CA for recurring pain) of patients, respectively. Each lesion underwent one single intervention, thus accounting for a total of 16 CA procedures. Eleven interventions were carried out under general anesthesia (11/16; 68.8%), with combination of ultrasound and cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) being the most used modality for image guidance (10/16; 62.5%). Nearly all interventions (15/16; 93.8%) required adjunctive protective measures with hydrodissection (13/16; 81.3%) and combination of hydrodissection and cutaneous protection with warm saline filled gloves (9/16; 56.3%) being the two most common protective measures. Two (2/16; 12.5%) complications were noted.
conclusionsPercutaneous CA of painful endometriosis deposits in unusual anatomic locations seems highly effective and safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40107987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.