Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40107693›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Learning programme for on-the-job reflection on guideline use in district nursing practice: a protocol for an action research study.

Inge Wolbers, Arjan van Os, Pieterbas Lalleman, Lisette Schoonhoven, Nienke Bleijenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inge WolbersProactive Care for Older People Living at Home, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands inge.wolbers@hu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4961-1745
Arjan van OsInstitute for Nursing Studies, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Pieterbas LallemanFontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Lisette SchoonhovenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Nienke BleijenbergProactive Care for Older People Living at Home, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe rising global demand for district nursing care necessitates effective strategies to support evidence-based decision-making. Despite the extensive development of nursing guidelines, adherence by district nursing teams remains suboptimal, revealing a gap between guideline development and daily practice. The Learning And Reflection for Nurses (LEARN) programme aims to bridge this gap by enhancing guideline use and fostering a learning attitude among district nursing teams. This protocol outlines the programme's development, components and evaluation approach. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An action research approach will be used to develop, adjust and evaluate the LEARN programme. The programme includes two interventions: a team-learning intervention focusing on guideline use and collective learning, and a leadership training intervention for district nurses to enhance their impact and role in adopting new knowledge. The team learning intervention will be sequentially deployed and evaluated in four district nursing teams across three care organisations, each lasting approximately 5 months. The leadership training will be conducted and evaluated in two cohorts, each lasting about 5 months. Participation in the team learning intervention requires at least one district nurse to participate in the leadership training. Each intervention will follow an action spiral structure, with learning outcomes from previous interventions carried over to the next. Data will be collected through observations, written reflections, focus groups and questionnaires via a mobile application. Data analysis will occur in two steps: parallel data collection and analysis during the intervention, followed by a longitudinal qualitative approach to identify learning processes over time and evaluate the intervention's impact. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the Ethical Committee Research of the HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (reference numbers 165-001-2022 and 157-001-2022). Findings will be disseminated continuously throughout the research via workshops, presentations and summary documents for district nurses and their teams, care organisations, strategic policymakers and the academic community.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicHealth Services ResearchHumansLeadershipLearningResearch DesignEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)NursesProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID40107693
PMCPMC11927463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.