Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40107686›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Perspectives of clozapine-naïve outpatients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia on clozapine commencement: a mixed-methods convergent study.

Michelle Iris Jakobsen, Stephen F Austin, Ole Jakob Storebø, Erik Simonsen, Jimmi Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Involuntary Clozapine Treatment: A Systematic Review.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle Iris JakobsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark miij@regionsjaelland.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8443-9074
Stephen F AustinPsychiatric Services Region Zealand East, Roskilde, Denmark.
Ole Jakob StorebøPsychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Services Region Zealand, Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0204-7745
Erik SimonsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6134-2392
Jimmi NielsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the perspectives of clozapine-naïve outpatients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia on clozapine commencement and the barriers and facilitators of it.

designA mixed-methods convergent design was employed using both qualitative and quantitative data on the same items.

settingIn-home visits or meetings at three Mental Health outpatient facilities in Region Zealand East, Denmark.

participantsClozapine-eligible, yet clozapine-naïve, outpatients with schizophrenia. A convenience sample of 206 patients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) was screened for clozapine eligibility. Clozapine eligibility included recurrent/continued prescription of APP throughout the past year, ≥ 3 different antipsychotics (APs) trialled at a therapeutic dose and ≥2 APs trialled adequately before current treatment. All eligible patients able to provide written informed consent were invited to participate.

methodsThe participants' perspectives were assessed qualitatively through semistructured interviews and quantitatively with closed-ended questions, numerical scale ratings, and standardised patient-reported outcome measures. Moreover, the participants' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected through case files, participant questionnaires, and clinical ratings made by the participants' treating clinicians. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Finally, qualitative and quantitative results were compared and merged to draw meta-inferences.

resultsEighteen patients were included, 10 (56%) were men and the median age was 30.0 years (IQR 24.8-37.8). Nine participants (50%) were willing to commence clozapine if offered now, nine were not. No apparent clinical or socioeconomic differences were observed between refusers and acceptors; however, the acceptors rated their subjective recovery on the Brief INSPIRE-O significantly lower than the refusers did, and qualitatively, they all expressed subjective distress due to their current symptoms. Three themes characterised the refusers' reasons for not accepting clozapine: 'Reconciliation with the current situation warrants no change in treatment', 'Clozapine is a last-resort treatment for last-resort people' and 'Permanent or situational reluctance due to practical aspects of treatment'. In the vast majority of cases, blood sampling had little or no impact on the participants' current willingness to commence clozapine, and quantitatively, blood sampling ranked lowest of the suggested barriers, whereas hospital admission for clozapine commencement ranked highest. The adverse side effects of clozapine, sedation and, weight gain in particular, were considered a major barrier if previously encountered with ineffective AP trials. The introduction of individualised commencement plans mitigating personal barriers was highlighted as the facilitator with the greatest impact on clozapine willingness, able to turn refusals into acceptance.

conclusionsPatients tend to prefer the predictability in status quo over switching to clozapine if they previously have trialled multiple APs with inadequate symptom reduction and subsequent deterioration/rehospitalisation or AP-induced weight gain and sedation. Moreover, the impression that clozapine treatment was unmanageable or a last-resort option further accentuated their reluctance to switch. Antipsychotic-trial fatigue and the stigma of clozapine as a last-resort treatment should be avoided by adhering to guidelines, thereby limiting the number of antipsychotics trialled before offering clozapine. Fortunately, it seems as if the patient's willingness to trial clozapine is positively impressionable to the conversation about customised commencement plans offering commencement on the patient's terms. For patients with subjective distress due to their symptoms, such plans can even reverse an initial clozapine refusalCite Now.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsClozapineOutpatientsSchizophreniaSchizophrenia, Treatment-ResistantAdultDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolypharmacyQualitative ResearchAntipsychotic AgentsClozapinePatient-Centered CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSchizophrenia & psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID40107686
PMCPMC12001365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.