Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40107276›Full record

SynthesisContact dermatitis2025

Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Neomycin in Dermatitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mikkel Bak Jensen, Daniel Isufi, Christoffer Kursawe Larsen, Jakob Ferløv Baselius Schwensen, Farzad Alinaghi, Jeanne Duus Johansen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Contact dermatitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mikkel Bak JensenNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-5735
Daniel IsufiDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2780-3604
Christoffer Kursawe LarsenNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2989-9198
Jakob Ferløv Baselius SchwensenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9756-656X
Farzad AlinaghiNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-4242
Jeanne Duus JohansenNational Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3537-8463

Funding

The Danish Environmental Protection Agency under the Ministry of Environment of Denmark
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neomycin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic frequently employed in topical formulations, is a recognised allergen that is part of many baseline series and can cause contact allergy (CA) in both adults and children. It is an allergen of interest as it has a widespread use in over-the-counter and prescription products globally, but geographical variations may exist. This study aimed to establish prevalence estimates of CA to neomycin in dermatitis patients and to investigate potential geographical variations. Three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) were screened, revealing 70 included studies comprising 456 372 adults and 17 720 children who underwent patch testing. The pooled prevalence of CA to neomycin was found to be 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6%-3.8%) in adults and 4.3% (95% CI: 2.65%-6.3%) in children. The highest prevalences were observed in North America (adults: 6.4%; children: 8.1%) and South Asia (adults: 4.9%), while Europe showed lower rates (adults: 2.5%; children: 0.8%). Studies after the year 2000 indicated a prevalence of 2.1% in adults and 5.1% in children across geographical regions. These findings highlight a public health concern, particularly in regions with high prevalence rates. The study underscores the need for more restrictive use of neomycin to reduce the incidence of neomycin-induced CA.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDermatitis, Allergic ContactNeomycinAdultChildHumansPatch TestsPrevalenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsNeomycinallergic contact dermatitisantibioticscontact allergyepidemiologyneomycinprevalence

Identifiers

PMID40107276
PMCPMC12134448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.