ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Machine Learning-Based Explainable Automated Nonlinear Computation Scoring System for Health Score and an Application for Prediction of Perioperative Stroke: Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable AI for Equitable Nurse Scheduling: Pragmatic Pre-Post Implementation Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Predicting Hungry Bone Syndrome with Interpretable Machine Learning: A Single-Center Cohort of Dialysis Patients Undergoing Parathyroidectomy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of machine learning approaches for suicide‑related outcomes: a meta‑analysis.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Article
- Machine and deep learning-based forecast of Tehran's accelerating nighttime surface heat island crisis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Risk stratification of postoperative enteral feeding intolerance using explainable machine learning in oral cancer free flap reconstruction.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Predicting early neurological deterioration in acute branch atheromatous disease without reperfusion therapy: a machine learning model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Enhancing privacy-preserving deployable large language models for perioperative complication detection: a targeted strategy with LoRA fine-tuning.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Federated multimodal AI for precision-equitable diabetes care.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning (ML) has the potential to enhance performance by capturing nonlinear interactions. However, ML-based models have some limitations in terms of interpretability.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a more comprehensible and efficient ML-based scoring system using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.
methodsWe developed and validated the Explainable Automated nonlinear Computation scoring system for Health (EACH) framework score. We developed a CatBoost-based prediction model, identified key features, and automatically detected the top 5 steepest slope change points based on SHAP plots. Subsequently, we developed a scoring system (EACH) and normalized the score. Finally, the EACH score was used to predict perioperative stroke. We developed the EACH score using data from the Seoul National University Hospital cohort and validated it using data from the Boramae Medical Center, which was geographically and temporally different from the development set.
resultsWhen applied for perioperative stroke prediction among 38,737 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, the EACH score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 (95% CI 0.753-0.892). In the external validation, the EACH score demonstrated superior predictive performance with an AUC of 0.784 (95% CI 0.694-0.871) compared with a traditional score (AUC=0.528, 95% CI 0.457-0.619) and another ML-based scoring generator (AUC=0.564, 95% CI 0.516-0.612).
conclusionsThe EACH score is a more precise, explainable ML-based risk tool, proven effective in real-world data. The EACH score outperformed traditional scoring system and other prediction models based on different ML techniques in predicting perioperative stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.