Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40106813›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Standard of Care Alone and in Combination With Homoeopathic Treatment in COVID-19-Related Rhino-Orbito-Cerebral Mucormycosis (ROCM): Protocol for a Single Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Harleen Kaur, Jyoti Sachdeva, Ramesh Bawaskar, Twinkle Goyal

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harleen Kaur *Central Council for Research in Homeopathy, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3864-6371
Jyoti Sachdeva *Dr.D.P. Rastogi Central Research Institute Homeopathy, Noida, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6953-1844
Ramesh Bawaskar *Regional Research Institute for Homoeopathy, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4116-3768
Twinkle Goyal *Central Council for Research in Homeopathy, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0009-0007-3293-1036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) is the most common (45%-74%) mucormycosis in India. With contemporary medical care, ROCM has a mortality rate of 40%-50% and 70% of survivors are left with residual defects. Recently, several cases of mucormycosis in people with COVID-19 have been increasingly reported worldwide, from India, due to immune dysregulation caused by SARS-CoV-2. To reduce the high mortality rate and residual defect in most survivors under the guidelines of the Ministry of AYUSH, the Government of India recommended homoeopathy as an add-on therapy to maximize the effectiveness of standard treatment in conventional therapy.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the role of existing homoeopathic treatment as an adjuvant therapy in patients with COVID-19-related ROCM and enhancing the survival of the patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 infection and to access the initial treatment response and duration required for significant or complete recovery in patients receiving adjuvant treatment.

methodsThis superiority, randomized controlled clinical trial would include two parallel comparator groups A and B. Group A would be the experimental group and would receive homoeopathic treatment along with the standard line of treatment as per investigational medicinal product (IMP) and group B would be the control arm and would receive standard line of treatment as per IMP along with identical placebo. Allocation would be 1:1 through randomization. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 36 participants per arm would be screened. Participants would be assessed clinically twice a day and magnetic resonance imagery or endoscopy cum-biopsy would be assessed on days 1, 14, and 28. Laboratory investigations may vary as per demand of disease conditions.

resultsIn India, the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly during the second wave, resulted in a surge of mucormycosis cases among patients with COVID-19. At the time this protocol was being developed, there was a significant spike in mucormycosis cases in India, particularly in Mumbai (June 2021). However, by the time the Central Council for Research in Homoeopathy obtained the necessary approvals and ethical clearance for the study, the incidence of mucormycosis had drastically declined (September 2021). As a result, the study was not initiated and registered. The authors feel it is their ethical responsibility to share the reviewed protocol with the medical community as a reference for future work.

conclusionsThis study aims to evaluate the role of existing homoeopathic medicines as an adjuvant therapy in managing COVID-19-related ROCM, potentially contributing to the use of homoeopathy as an evidence-based medical approach. The protocol can also serve as a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers addressing mucormycosis cases unrelated to COVID-19, particularly in immunocompromised patients. It would help ensure preparedness, whether or not sufficient evidence is available, in the event of a future health emergency. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/57905.

Indexed as

COVID-19HomeopathyMucormycosisOrbital DiseasesAntifungal AgentsCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentFemaleHumansIndiaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Single-Blind MethodStandard of CareTreatment OutcomeAntifungal Agentsconventional therapyethicalhomoeopathic medicinesIndiamanagementmedical caremortalitymortality raterecoveryRhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis, randomized controlled trial, homoeopathy, fungus, CE-MRI PNS mucormycosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID40106813
PMCPMC11966070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.