Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40106785›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025

Enzyme Enhancement Through Computational Stability Design Targeting NMR-Determined Catalytic Hotspots.

Luis I Gutierrez-Rus, Eva Vos, David Pantoja-Uceda, Gyula Hoffka, Jose Gutierrez-Cardenas, Mariano Ortega-Muñoz, Valeria A Risso, Maria Angeles Jimenez, Shina C L Kamerlin, Jose M Sanchez-Ruiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Substrate scope of ancestral versus modern family-1 glycosidases.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Structure-activity relationships in catalytic amyloids.Journal of inorganic biochemistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luis I Gutierrez-RusDepartamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Unidad de Excelencia de Química Aplicada a Biomedicina y Medioambiente (UEQ), Universidad de Granada, Granada 18071, Spain.
Eva VosSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
David Pantoja-UcedaDepartamento de Química Física Biológica, Instituto de Química Física Blas Cabrera (IQF-CSIC), Madrid 28006, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-6972
Gyula HoffkaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen 4032, Hungary.
Jose Gutierrez-CardenasSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Mariano Ortega-MuñozDepartamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Unidad de Excelencia de Química Aplicada a Biomedicina y Medioambiente (UEQ), Universidad de Granada, Granada 18071, Spain.
Valeria A RissoDepartamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Unidad de Excelencia de Química Aplicada a Biomedicina y Medioambiente (UEQ), Universidad de Granada, Granada 18071, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8262-8843
Maria Angeles JimenezDepartamento de Química Física Biológica, Instituto de Química Física Blas Cabrera (IQF-CSIC), Madrid 28006, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6835-5850
Shina C L KamerlinSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3190-1173
Jose M Sanchez-RuizDepartamento de Química Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Unidad de Excelencia de Química Aplicada a Biomedicina y Medioambiente (UEQ), Universidad de Granada, Granada 18071, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9056-3928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzymes are the quintessential green catalysts, but realizing their full potential for biotechnology typically requires improvement of their biomolecular properties. Catalysis enhancement, however, is often accompanied by impaired stability. Here, we show how the interplay between activity and stability in enzyme optimization can be efficiently addressed by coupling two recently proposed methodologies for guiding directed evolution. We first identify catalytic hotspots from chemical shift perturbations induced by transition-state-analogue binding and then use computational/phylogenetic design (FuncLib) to predict stabilizing combinations of mutations at sets of such hotspots. We test this approach on a previously designed de novo Kemp eliminase, which is already highly optimized in terms of both activity and stability. Most tested variants displayed substantially increased denaturation temperatures and purification yields. Notably, our most efficient engineered variant shows a ∼3-fold enhancement in activity (

Indexed as

EnzymesBiocatalysisEnzyme StabilityMolecular Dynamics SimulationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein EngineeringEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID40106785
PMCPMC12151457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.