ArticlePloS one2025
A method for PCR-free library preparation for sequencing palaeogenomes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Amplification bias in sequencing-based spatial transcriptomics: sources, mechanisms, impacts, and mitigation strategies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, methodological advances have substantially improved our ability to recover DNA molecules from ancient samples, raising the possibility to sequence palaeogenomes without PCR amplification. Here we present an amplification-free library preparation method based on a benchmark library preparation protocol in palaeogenomics based on single-stranded DNA, and demonstrate suitability of the new method for a range of sample types. Furthermore, we use the method to generate the first amplification-free nuclear genome of a Pleistocene cave bear, and analyse the resulting data in the context of cave bear population genetics and phylogenetics using standard genomic clustering analyses. We find that the PCR-free adaptation provides endogenous DNA contents, GC contents and fragment lengths consistent with the standard protocol, although with reduced conversion efficiency, and shows no biases in downstream population clustering analyses. Our amplification-free library preparation method could find application in experimental designs where the original template molecule needs to be characterised more directly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.