ArticleSICOT-J2025
Current concepts in total knee arthroplasty: Rotating hinge prostheses.
Article in SICOT-J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [The influence of articular surface conformity on the biomechanics of rotating hinge knee prostheses].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- Influence of constraint mechanism on kinematics, contact mechanics, and polyethylene wear in dual-axis rotating hinge and ball-and-socket knee prostheses: a finite element study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Implant selection and causes of aseptic failure in conversion from unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: A high-volume centre series.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of standard primary vs. primary rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective matched-pair analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review evaluates the purpose and functionality of rotating hinged total knee arthroplasty (RHTKA). The main indications for an RHTKA are poor bone stock, soft tissue compromise, gross instability, and periprosthetic fractures. Studies have shown that an RHTKA may be used in both the primary and revision scenarios to improve the range of motion and functional outcomes. Radiostereometric analysis has shown that some RHTKA designs are associated with early femoral component micromotion, but this has not translated to increased failure or revision rates. Implant survivorship with a modern RHTKA is comparable to a condylar-constrained TKA at mid-term follow-up. The most common complications associated with RHTKA are aseptic loosening, periprosthetic joint infection, stiffness and periprosthetic fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.