Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40106480›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

MCount: An automated colony counting tool for high-throughput microbiology.

Sijie Chen, Po-Hsun Huang, Hyungseok Kim, Yuhe Cui, Cullen R Buie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sijie ChenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9839-3700
Po-Hsun HuangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Hyungseok KimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-946X
Yuhe CuiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Cullen R BuieDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2275-4570

Funding

A universal pipeline for functional characterization of the human microbiota at a massive scaleRM1GM135102 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BUIE, CULLEN RICHARD, DEUTSCHBAUER, ADAM M · 2020 to 2024
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS RM1 GM135102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate colony counting is crucial for assessing microbial growth in high-throughput workflows. However, existing automated counting solutions struggle with the issue of merged colonies, a common occurrence in high-throughput plating. To overcome this limitation, we propose MCount, the only known solution that incorporates both contour information and regional algorithms for colony counting. By optimizing the pairing of contours with regional candidate circles, MCount can accurately infer the number of merged colonies. We evaluate MCount on a precisely labeled Escherichia coli dataset of 960 images (15,847 segments) and achieve an average error rate of 3.99%, significantly outperforming existing published solutions such as NICE (16.54%), AutoCellSeg (33.54%), and OpenCFU (50.31%). MCount is user-friendly as it only requires two hyperparameters. To further facilitate deployment in scenarios with limited labeled data, we propose statistical methods for selecting the hyperparameters using few labeled or even unlabeled data points, all of which guarantee consistently low error rates. MCount presents a promising solution for accurate and efficient colony counting in application workflows requiring high throughput, particularly in cases with merged colonies.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysSoftwareAlgorithmsAutomationColony Count, Microbial

Identifiers

PMID40106480
PMCPMC11957731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.