Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40106428›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Outcomes of orangutan wild-to-wild translocations reveal conservation and welfare risks.

Julie Sherman, Maria Voigt, Marc Ancrenaz, Erik Meijaard, Felicity Oram, Elizabeth A Williamson, Anne E Russon, David J I Seaman, Christine Caurant, Dirck Byler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Decomposition Dynamics of an Orangutan (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julie ShermanWildlife Impact, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Maria VoigtWildlife Impact, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Marc AncrenazHUTAN, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia.
Erik MeijaardBorneo Futures, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam.
Felicity OramOrangJUGA, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5368-0415
Elizabeth A WilliamsonFaculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6848-9154
Anne E RussonDepartment of Psychology, Glendon College, York University, Toronto, Canada.
David J I SeamanDurrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Christine CaurantIndependent Conservation Consultant, Lannion, France.
Dirck BylerIUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group Section on Great Apes, c/o Re:wild, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Serge A WichSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

Fish and Wildlife Service – Multinational Species Conservation Fund F18AP00914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild orangutans (Pongo spp.) are captured and moved (wild-to-wild translocated) primarily to prevent crop foraging or out of concern for orangutans' survival in fragmented habitat. Little is known about wild-to-wild translocation frequency, circumstances, and possible species conservation and individual welfare outcomes. We investigated orangutan wild-to-wild translocations in Indonesia from 2005 to 2022 using primarily data from public sources and consultation with practitioners. At least 988 wild orangutans were captured for translocation during the study period, including many reproductively valuable resident females and adult males removed from unprotected fragmented forests and forest patches. Data on health condition (n = 808) indicated 81.7% were reported as healthy at time of capture. Information on post-capture disposition (n = 268) showed that only 23% were translocated immediately. Mean estimated killing combined with reported translocation removals was calculated to affect 3.3% of orangutans in Kalimantan, and 11.6% in Sumatra, both higher than the threshold of mortality from human actions expected to drive populations to extinction. Negative impacts are likely compounded where multiple individuals are translocated from the same area, and for the Tapanuli orangutan (P. tapanuliensis), which has the smallest population and range of all orangutan species. Data on reasons for capture (n = 743) indicated most translocations (69%) were conducted to address crop foraging and orangutan presence in or around croplands and plantations. Forest cover analysis around 104 orangutan capture sites with high resolution spatial information indicated that deforestation levels in the year preceding capture were not significantly associated with likelihood of captures for translocation. To improve conservation outcomes, wild-to-wild translocations should be used only in exceptional circumstances. Most orangutans should instead be monitored and protected in situ by addressing conflicts and maintaining the forests, including forest fragments, they are using. When translocation is necessary, post-release survival and potential conservation impacts must be monitored.

Indexed as

Animals, WildConservation of Natural ResourcesPongoAnimalsEcosystemEndangered SpeciesFemaleForestsIndonesiaMale

Identifiers

PMID40106428
PMCPMC11970725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.