Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40106411›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A framework to identify opportunities to address socioscientific issues in the elementary school curricula: A case study from England, Italy, and Portugal.

Patrícia Pessoa, Joelyn de Lima, Valentina Piacentini, Giulia Realdon, Alex Jeffries, Lino Ometto, J Bernardino Lopes, Dana L Zeidler, Maria João Fonseca, Bruno Sousa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Patrícia PessoaResearch Centre in the Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers (CIDTFF.UA), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugaland University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8114-795X
Joelyn de LimaW.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, E Gull Lake Dr, Hickory Corners, Michigan, United States of America and The Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9235-9704
Valentina PiacentiniResearch Centre in the Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers (CIDTFF.UA), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugaland "Via Merope" school cluster, Rome, Italy.
Giulia RealdonUNICAMearth Group, Geology Section, University of Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-4269
Alex JeffriesMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0004-6923-0979
Lino OmettoDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-625X
J Bernardino LopesResearch Centre in the Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers (CIDTFF.UA), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugaland University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Vila Real, Portugal.
Dana L ZeidlerDepartment of Teaching and Learning, College of Education, East Fowler Avenue, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
Maria João FonsecaNatural History and Science Museum of the University of Porto (MHNC-UP), Praça Gomes Teixeira, Porto, Portugal.
Bruno SousaAlpoente - Albufeira poente school cluster, Rua das Escolas, Apartado , Albufeira, Portugal.
Alexandre PintoCentre for Research and Innovation in Education - inED, ESE, Polytechnic of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3774-0884
Xana Sá-PintoResearch Centre in the Didactics and Technology in the Education of Trainers (CIDTFF.UA), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific literacy is crucial to address important and complex societal problems, both current and future. Teaching using a socioscientific issues (SSI) approach is a potential strategy to develop students' scientific literacy, although teachers have reported concerns about its implementation, such as the inability to add additional distinct requirements to already demanding curricula. To facilitate this task, we describe the development of a valid and reliable instrument for curricula analysis, called "Framework for Identifying Opportunities to implement an SSI approach in science school curricula" (FIOSSI), and use it to identify opportunities to implement the SSI approach in the elementary school science curriculum of three European countries (England, Italy and Portugal). The framework categorizes SSI opportunities into three areas: 1) awareness of the issue; 2) socioscientific reasoning; and 3) socioscientific identity. Our analyses of the three countries' elementary curricula reveal that the current versions have significant opportunities to explore awareness of SSI (especially relating to environmental and human health issues), promote the development of socioscientific reasoning, and foster socioscientific identity. FIOSSI can be a useful tool for education research and practice, and our results can help inform future research and guide educational policies.

Indexed as

CurriculumSchoolsScienceChildEnglandHumansItalyPortugalStudents

Identifiers

PMID40106411
PMCPMC11957555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.