ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Prediction of the wall-invasion pattern of advanced gallbladder carcinoma using extracellular volume fraction.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the utility of extracellular volume (ECV) fraction for predicting wall-invasion patterns in advanced gallbladder carcinoma (GBCA). MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients who had surgically resected GBCA at a single institution were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) before the surgery. Based on pathological examinations, the wall-invasion pattern of GBCA was classified into two groups: infiltrative growth (IG, n = 19) and destructive growth (DG, n = 11). ECV map was generated by inputting the patients' hematocrit values and subtraction algorithms using pre-contrast and equilibrium phase images. CT parameters were evaluated by two radiologists (Rad1 and Rad2). The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to identify significant CT parameters for differentiating between the two groups. The diagnostic ability was measured using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between the two groups were compared using the log-rank test.
resultsThirty patients (mean age, 75.5 years; 20 men) were evaluated. Mean ECV fraction of the DG-type (Rad1, 34.5%; Rad2, 34.1%) was significantly higher than that of the IG-type (Rad1, 28.5%; Rad2, 28.8%) (p < 0.05). The ECV values of the two radiologists indicated that the areas under the ROC curves for differentiation between the two groups were Rad1, 0.91 and Rad2, 0.84 (p < 0.05). Medium RFS of the DG-type (970 days) was significantly shorter than that of the IG-type (2200 days) (p < 0.05).
conclusionECV fraction demonstrates potential as the most valuable predictor of the DG type of GBCA, which has a higher recurrence rate compared with the IG type. However, further large-scale multi-center studies are required to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.