ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Semantic segmentation for individual thigh skeletal muscles of athletes on magnetic resonance images.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI image segmentation of the major lower leg muscles using deep learning: application in biomechanical analysis.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Optimizing MRI annotation workflows for high-accuracy deep learning thigh muscle segmentation in athletes.Radiology advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The skeletal muscles that athletes should train vary depending on their discipline and position. Therefore, individual skeletal muscle cross-sectional area assessment is important in the development of training strategies. To measure the cross-sectional area of skeletal muscle, manual segmentation of each muscle is performed using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. This task is time-consuming and requires significant effort. Additionally, interobserver variability can sometimes be problematic. The purpose of this study was to develop an automated computerized method for semantic segmentation of individual thigh skeletal muscles from MR images of athletes. Our database consisted of 697 images from the thighs of 697 elite athletes. The images were randomly divided into a training dataset (70%), a validation dataset (10%), and a test dataset (20%). A label image was generated for each image by manually annotating 15 object classes: 12 different skeletal muscles, fat, bones, and vessels and nerves. Using the validation dataset, DeepLab v3+ was chosen from three different semantic segmentation models as a base model for segmenting individual thigh skeletal muscles. The feature extractor in DeepLab v3+ was also optimized to ResNet50. The mean Jaccard index and Dice index for the proposed method were 0.853 and 0.916, respectively, which were significantly higher than those from conventional DeepLab v3+ (Jaccard index: 0.810, p < .001; Dice index: 0.887, p < .001). The proposed method achieved a mean area error for 15 objective classes of 3.12%, useful in the assessment of skeletal muscle cross-sectional area from MR images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40106201What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.