Observational studyAdvances in therapy2025
A Real-World Study on the Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: INTEGRATE Study.
Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvements in health-related quality of life with esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine extended release.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Trial
- Intranasal administration in modulating depressive-like behavior and reconstructing treatment paradigms through neuroinflammation and neurotrophic pathways.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Remission is insufficient: predictors and mechanistic models of recurrence in late-life depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Real-world clinical practice, effectiveness and safety of esketamine nasal spray in major depressive disorder patients: a French prospective cohort (ELLIPSE study).Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Mental health professionals' perspective on the use of esketamine in treatment-resistant depression and their motivation to adopt it: a Saudi cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe INTEGRATE study aimed to provide information on the use, effectiveness, and safety of esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS) for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in real-world practice in Spain.
methodsThis was an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study conducted in adults aged 18-74 years who met the criteria for TRD. The weekly impact of ESK-NS on depressive symptoms was evaluated by clinical judgment using four categories (nonresponse, response, remission, not available). The onset of action 24 h after administration was also evaluated. Information on adverse events was collected from the medical records.
resultsWe included 196 patients, of whom 189 were considered evaluable; the mean (SD) number of previous episodes was 3.7 (3.0). According to the investigator's judgment, 152 (80.4%) of 189 patients were in response or remission in the induction phase, and 54 (90%) of 60 during the maintenance phase. The proportions of patients in remission were 9.5%, 18.7%, and 38.3% during the induction, optimization, and maintenance phases, respectively. Fifty-three (28.0%) patients experienced an improvement in depressive symptoms within the first 24 h after the first administration of ESK-NS. Most adverse events reported with ESK-NS were mild and did not require any action with the study drug; the number of adverse events decreased over time, especially during the first 4 weeks.
conclusionConsistent with the available evidence, the results of this study indicate that ESK-NS is an effective and safe option to consider within the therapeutic algorithm for TRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40106175What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.