Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40106175›Full record

Observational studyAdvances in therapy2025

A Real-World Study on the Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: INTEGRATE Study.

Patricio Molero, Angela Ibañez, Javier de Diego-Adeliño, J Antoni Ramos-Quiroga, Marta García Dorado, Paola M López Rengel, Pilar A Saiz

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improvements in health-related quality of life with esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine extended release.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Remission is insufficient: predictors and mechanistic models of recurrence in late-life depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricio MoleroDepartment of Psychiatry, Clínica Universidad de Navarra. Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9287-9635
Angela IbañezDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2751-0150
Javier de Diego-AdeliñoDepartment of Psychiatry, Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR Sant Pau), Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (HSCSP), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9708-2441
J Antoni Ramos-QuirogaMental Health Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1622-0350
Marta García DoradoMedical Department, Medical Affairs, Janssen-Cilag S.A., Johnson & Johnson Company, Paseo de las Doce Estrellas, 5-7, 28042, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6972-6131
Paola M López RengelMedical Department, Medical Affairs, Janssen-Cilag S.A., Johnson & Johnson Company, Paseo de las Doce Estrellas, 5-7, 28042, Madrid, Spain. plopez9@its.jnj.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2496-8337
Pilar A SaizDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5705-4523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe INTEGRATE study aimed to provide information on the use, effectiveness, and safety of esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS) for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in real-world practice in Spain.

methodsThis was an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study conducted in adults aged 18-74 years who met the criteria for TRD. The weekly impact of ESK-NS on depressive symptoms was evaluated by clinical judgment using four categories (nonresponse, response, remission, not available). The onset of action 24 h after administration was also evaluated. Information on adverse events was collected from the medical records.

resultsWe included 196 patients, of whom 189 were considered evaluable; the mean (SD) number of previous episodes was 3.7 (3.0). According to the investigator's judgment, 152 (80.4%) of 189 patients were in response or remission in the induction phase, and 54 (90%) of 60 during the maintenance phase. The proportions of patients in remission were 9.5%, 18.7%, and 38.3% during the induction, optimization, and maintenance phases, respectively. Fifty-three (28.0%) patients experienced an improvement in depressive symptoms within the first 24 h after the first administration of ESK-NS. Most adverse events reported with ESK-NS were mild and did not require any action with the study drug; the number of adverse events decreased over time, especially during the first 4 weeks.

conclusionConsistent with the available evidence, the results of this study indicate that ESK-NS is an effective and safe option to consider within the therapeutic algorithm for TRD.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantKetamineAdministration, IntranasalAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal SpraysRetrospective StudiesSpainTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsEsketamineKetamineNasal SpraysEsketamine nasal sprayObservational studyReal-world evidenceRemissionResponseTreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.