ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025
Optimising fluid therapy during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: current evidence and future directions.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early active normothermia versus no temperature control in a porcine model of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, acute kidney injury, fluid balance, and continuous renal replacement therapy: Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) and Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) joint consensus conference.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Changes in COJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Deleterious Effects of Liberal Fluid Therapy During Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Porcine Model of Prolonged Cardiac Arrest.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Optimization of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Weaning: Hemodynamic Targets, Predictive Indicators, and Future Algorithm.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) offers an immediate and effective mechanical cardio-circulatory support for critically ill patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or selected refractory cardiac arrest. As fluid therapy is routinely performed as a component of initial hemodynamic resuscitation of ECMO supported patients, this narrative review intends to summarize the rationale and the evidence on the fluid resuscitation strategy in terms of fluid type and dosing, the impact of fluid balance on outcomes and fluid responsiveness assessment in VA-ECMO patients. Several observational studies have shown a deleterious impact of positive fluid balance on survival and renal outcomes. With regard to the type of crystalloids, further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of saline versus balanced solutions in terms of hemodynamic stability, renal outcomes and survival in VA-ECMO setting. The place and the impact of albumin replacement, as a second-line option, should be investigated. During VA-ECMO run, the fluid management approach could be divided into four phases: rescue or salvage, optimization, stabilization, and evacuation or de-escalation. Echocardiographic assessment of stroke volume changes following a fluid challenge or provocative tests is the most used tool in clinical practice to predict fluid responsiveness. This review underscores the need for high-quality evidence regarding the optimal fluid strategy and the choice of fluid type in ECMO supported patients. Pending specific data, fluid therapy needs to be personalized and guided by dynamic hemodynamic approach coupled to close monitoring of daily weight and fluid balance in order to provide adequate ECMO flow and tissue perfusion while avoiding harmful effects of fluid overload.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.