Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40106081›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025

Review and future outlook for the removal of microplastics by physical, biological and chemical methods in water bodies and wastewaters.

Marco Antonio Alvarez Amparán, Adriana Palacios, German Miranda Flores, Pedro Manuel Castro Olivera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marco Antonio Alvarez AmparánDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, 04510, México. malvarez@quimica.unam.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0624-9985
Adriana PalaciosDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla, Alimentos y Ambiental. Santa Catarina Mártir, Puebla. C.P. 72810, San Andrés Cholula, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6972-5988
German Miranda FloresDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla, Alimentos y Ambiental. Santa Catarina Mártir, Puebla. C.P. 72810, San Andrés Cholula, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5167-8239
Pedro Manuel Castro OliveraDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla, Alimentos y Ambiental. Santa Catarina Mártir, Puebla. C.P. 72810, San Andrés Cholula, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6923-9826

Funding

The authors acknowledge the support of the Project Support Program for Research and Technological Innovation (PAPIIT) of UNAM Project IA105125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) have become a major global environmental problem due to their accelerated distribution throughout different environments. Their widespread presence is a potential threat to the ecosystems because they alter the natural interaction among their constituent elements. MPs are considered as emergent pollutants due to the huge amount existing in the environment and by the toxic effects they can cause in living beings. The removal of MPs from water bodies and wastewaters is a control strategy that needs to be implemented from the present on and strictly constantly in the near future to control and mitigate their distribution into other environments. The present work shows a detailed comparison of the current potential technologies for the remediation of the MPs pollution. That is, physical, biological, and chemical methods for the removal of MPs from water bodies and wastewaters. Focusing mainly on the discussion of the perspective on the current innovative technologies for the removal or degradation of the MPs, rather than in a deep technical discussion of the methodologies. The selected novel physical methods discussed are adsorption, ultrafiltration, dynamic membranes and flotation. The physical methods are used to modify the physical properties of the MPs particles to facilitate their removal. The biological methods for the removal of MPs are based on the use of different bacterial strains, worms, mollusks or fungus to degrade MPs particles due to the hydrocarbon chain decrease of the particles, because these kinds of microorganisms feed on these organic chains. The degradation of MPs in water bodies and wastewaters by chemical methods is focusing on coagulation, electrocoagulation, photocatalysis, and ozonation. Chemical methods achieve the degradation of MPs by the modification of the chemical structure of the particles either by the change of the surface of the particles or by attacking radicals with a high oxidation capacity. Additionally, some interesting combinations of physical, chemical, and biological methods are discussed. Finally, this work includes a critical discussion and comparison of several novel methods for the removal or degradation of MPs from water bodies and wastewaters, emphasizing the areas of opportunity and challenges to be faced.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiodegradation, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringMicroplasticsWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiological degradationChemical degradationMicroplastic degradationMicroplastic removalMicroplastic reviewPhysical removal

Identifiers

PMID40106081
PMCPMC11923036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.