ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Development of a Semi-automatic Finite Element Modeling Workflow for the Evaluation of Cranial Suture-Bone Complex Temporal Strain Evolution During Growth.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to develop a semi-automatic workflow for medical image segmentation and finite element (FE) modeling. The workflow was subsequently used to investigate the temporal evolution of the localized mechanical strain in the rat coronal suture during normal growth.
methodsThe subject-specific FE models were created based on in vivo longitudinal micro-computed tomography images acquired from n = 4 rats (AUP00003759, 11/04/2021). The FE models were created through a semi-automatic workflow that consisted of a semi-automatic segmentation of the rat cranial sutures, a simplified full skull model, and the detailed coronal suture model. Simulated intracranial pressure loading was implemented, and the localized equivalent, maximum principal, and minimum principal strains were estimated at volumes of interest (VOIs) selected along the suture-bone interface.
resultsThe semi-automatic segmentations were consistent among operators with a coefficient of variation of 1.8% and showed good agreement compared to the manual segmentation, with maximum differences of 4.1% and 2.0% in terms of suture volume and surface area, respectively. The estimated strains evolved with a trend increasing from 7 to 9 week and 9 to 11 week time intervals and decreasing from 11 to 16 week time interval for all VOIs. The results showed that strains at VOIs significantly changed (p < 0.05) over time. The concave regions of the suture experienced the highest magnitude of strains.
conclusionThe presented research has developed an appropriate semi-automatic FE workflow capable of evaluating temporal changes in mechanical strain of cranial sutures during growth, and was utilized to demonstrate transient and location-specific changes in the rat coronal suture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40106080What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.