ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Effectiveness and safety of three NiTi systems in endodontic retreatment of MB1 and MB2 root canals: a micro-CT and CBCT combined analysis.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Negotiability of MB2 root canals using rotary or reciprocating systems: a randomized clinical trial.Brazilian oral research · 2026Trial
- Filling ability and blooming artifact expression in long-oval root canals: influence of CBCT device, endodontic sealer, and BAR filter.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Expression of Metallic Artifacts Caused by Intracanal Medications with Different Chemical Compositions in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the performance in endodontic retreatment and pericervical dentin preservation using ProDesign Logic (PDL), Reciproc Blue (RB), and WaveOne Gold (WOG) NiTi systems in first (MB1) and second (MB2) mesiobuccal root canals of maxillary molars, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). MATERIALS AND
methodsMB1 and MB2 canals were prepared, filled, and randomized into four groups (n = 8). MB1 were retreated using PDL up to file 40/0.05 or RB R40 (40/0.06), while MB2 were retreated using PDL up to file 35/0.05 or WOG (35/0.06). Micro-CT scans were performed before and after retreatment to assess the remaining filling material, canal transportation, and canal centralization. Dentin removal and remaining dentin were measured at four levels below the furcation through CBCT scans analyzed with the e-Vol DX software, with micro-CT serving as the reference standard.
resultsRB was more effective than PDL in removing MB1 filling material, while PDL outperformed WOG in the apical third of MB2 (p < 0.05). Overall, CBCT measurements for dentin removal were consistent with micro-CT in MB1 but occasionally underestimated in MB2 (p < 0.05). A significant reduction in MB2 danger zone dentin thickness below 0.5 mm was observed after retreatment (p < 0.05).
conclusionsRB was more effective in retreating MB1, while PDL was more efficient in the apical third of MB2. A substantial decrease in dentin thickness in the MB2 danger zone was noted after retreatment, regardless of the NiTi system or imaging modality used. Overall, CBCT scans provided consistent assessments of dentin. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Selecting appropriate NiTi systems minimizes dentin removal in MB1 and MB2 danger zones, reducing the risk of perforation in the furcation area. CBCT reliably assesses dentin thickness, aiding clinical decisions and improving endodontic retreatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40106069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.