ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: does tuberosity reinsertion improve the functional outcomes more than 5 years after surgery?
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tuberosity refixation in reverse proximal humerus fracture arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study with two-year follow-up.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Should tuberosities be reattached in patients over 80 years old treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty after proximal humeral fractures?Shoulder & elbow · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhile tuberosity reinsertion significantly improves the short-term functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty done for proximal humerus fracture, we do not know how well these results hold over the long term. The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of tuberosity reinsertion on the quality of life of patients and the functional outcomes of the operated limb after a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
methodsSixty-two patients were included. Their mean age at the final review was 79 ± 10 years. The Katz and Lawton scales, Constant score, DASH and SSV were collected. Radiographs were made at the final assessment to analyze the position of the tuberosities and to look for radiological signs of implant loosening.
resultsThe mean follow-up was 6.7 ± 1.5 years. The tuberosities had been reinserted in 35 patients (56%). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the Katz (p = 0.60) and Lawton (p = 0.49) scales, nor the DASH (p = 0.45) or SSV (p = 0.49) at the final review. The Constant score was significantly better in the patients who had their tuberosities reinserted (p = 0.01), also the active forward flexion (p = 0.02), the internal rotation (p = 0.01), and the external rotation arm abduction (p = 0.02), but there was no significant difference for external rotation elbow at side (p = 0.14). None of the patients underwent revision surgery for implant loosening.
conclusionTuberosity reinsertion has a functional benefit beyond 5 years postoperative, although it does not appear to have a significant effect on the geriatric outcomes or the subjective clinical scores. The patients regained satisfactory independence for an orthogeriatric population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Retrospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.