SynthesisJournal of neurology2025
Flexible exoskeleton-assisted training enhances lower limb motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Knee-Powered Exoskeleton-Assisted Gait Training on Walking Function and Symmetry in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Pilot Trial.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Exoskeletal-Assisted Training in Veterans With Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Article
- Reproducible candidate kinematic-electromyographic waveform markers of post-stroke gait from public multimodal waveform exports.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
- Characteristics of Trunk Acceleration and Angular Velocity in Turning Movement in Post-Stroke Patients with High Risk of Falling.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent advances in flexible exoskeleton technology have broadened its application in stroke rehabilitation, particularly for improving motor functions in the affected lower limb. This review examines the impact of flexible exoskeleton-assisted training (FEAT) compared to conventional therapy on balance, motor functions, and gait parameters in post-stroke patients.
methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified through database searches and manual screening, focusing on outcomes such as balance (Berg Balance Scale, BBS), lower limb motor functions (Ten-Meter Walk Test, 10MWT; Six-Minute Walk Test, 6MWT; Functional Ambulation Category, FAC), and gait parameters (walking speed, step length, cadence, and symmetry).
resultsThis meta-analysis included 6 studies with 213 patients. FEAT significantly enhanced BBS scores, and performances on the 10MWT and 6MWT, along with other gait parameters; however, FAC scores did not improve significantly. Subgroup analyses revealed that FEAT with hip assistance significantly improved step length, cadence, and gait symmetry ratio, while ankle assistance improved performance on the 10MWT and 6MWT. FEAT was especially effective in improving step length, cadence, and gait symmetry ratio in patients with a post-stroke duration exceeding three months.
conclusionCompared to the conventional therapy, FEAT markedly improves the balance, walking ability, and gait parameters in stroke rehabilitation. These findings support the value of FEAT in lower extremity rehabilitation post-stroke, suggesting its integration into clinical programs could enhance the therapy effectiveness or efficiency. In addition, the appropriate type of FEAT needs to be selected in the rehabilitation program based on the patient's specific impairment. For example, FEAT with hip assistance may be recommended for stroke patients with severe gait asymmetry, aiding the development of personalized interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40106023What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.