Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40105972›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2025

The efficacy of islet autoantibody screening with or without genetic pre-screening strategies for the identification of presymptomatic type 1 diabetes.

Ezio Bonifacio, Raquel Coelho, Domenik A Ewald, Gita Gemulla, Michael Hubmann, Przemyslawa Jarosz-Chobot, Mirjam Kohls, Olga Kordonouri, Vito Lampasona, Parth Narendran and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ezio BonifacioCenter for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. ezio.bonifacio@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8704-4713
Raquel CoelhoPediatric Department, APDP-Diabetes Portugal, Education and Research Center (APDP-ERC), Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9325-088X
Domenik A EwaldPractice for Paediatric Medicine, Regensburg, Germany.
Gita GemullaDepartment of Paediatrics, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7843-2669
Michael HubmannPractice for Paediatric Medicine, Zirndorf, Germany.
Przemyslawa Jarosz-ChobotDepartment of Children's Diabetology and Lifestyle Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-0994
Mirjam KohlsInstitute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4943-7791
Olga KordonouriDepartment of Pediatrics, Diabetology, Endocrinology, and Clinical Research, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus AUF DER BULT, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9563-3537
Vito LampasonaDiabetes Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5162-8445
Parth NarendranDepartment of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4583-8793
Flemming PociotClinical and Translational Research, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3274-5448
Zdenek ŠumníkDepartment of Pediatrics, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6462-6462
Agnieszka SzypowskaDepartment of Paediatric Diabetology and Paediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3407-3174
Jose Zapardiel-GonzaloInstitute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9098-1652
Anette-Gabriele ZieglerInstitute of Diabetes Research, Helmholtz Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6290-5548

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung FZK 01KX1818Innovative Health Initiative grant agreement No 101132379Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust G-2103-05036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early detection of type 1 diabetes, in its presymptomatic stage, offers significant clinical advantages, including treatment that can delay disease onset. Current screening focuses on identifying islet autoantibody positivity, with proposed optimal testing at ages 2, 6 and 10 years potentially achieving up to 80% sensitivity. However, challenges arise from participation rates and costs associated with multiple screenings. Genetic pre-screening has been suggested as a complementary strategy to target high-risk individuals prior to autoantibody testing, but its real-world benefits remain uncertain. Broad genetic selection strategies, based on family history, HLA typing or polygenic risk scores, can identify subsets of the population at elevated risk. However, these approaches face issues like low recall rates, socioeconomic biases and limited applicability across diverse ancestries. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness and infrastructure requirements of integrating genetic testing into routine healthcare remain significant hurdles. The combined use of genetic and autoantibody testing could improve predictive value, especially with innovations like point-of-care genetic testing. Yet, the ultimate success of any screening programme depends less on specific strategies and more on maximising public and healthcare-provider engagement, ensuring high participation, and addressing socioeconomic and demographic disparities. Digital-health infrastructure may play a crucial role in improving recall rates and maintaining follow-up adherence. In conclusion, while repeated islet autoantibody screening remains the most effective standalone approach, conducting genetic screening prior to islet autoantibody testing may be practical in certain contexts, provided that sufficient resources and equitable strategies are employed. Public engagement and robust infrastructure are essential to realising the full potential of early type 1 diabetes detection programmes.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Genetic TestingIslets of LangerhansHumansMass ScreeningAutoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID40105972
PMCPMC12069122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.