ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
Hungarian Translation and Validation of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPelvic organ prolapse (POP) significantly affects women's quality of life, making the availability of validated, culturally adapted tools for reliable symptom evaluation essential. In this study, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) was translated into Hungarian and validated, with the assessment of its psychometric properties for clinical and research use.
methodsIn total, 125 women diagnosed with symptomatic POP (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Score-POP-Q stage ≥ 2) completed the Hungarian POP-SS (POP-SS-H), the Hungarian version of the Australian Pelvic Floor Questionnaire (AFPQ-H), and the short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). Exploratory factor analysis was performed, McDonald's ω was used to assess internal consistency, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to examine test-retest reliability over a 2-week interval.
resultsThe POP-SS-H demonstrated strong psychometric properties (overall ICC = 0.96, p < 0.001). Item ICCs were 0.69-0.99, with "difficulty in emptying the bladder" being the most stable. The scale has a two-factor ("prolapse and urinary distress" and "abdominal strain and bowel discomfort") structure. McDonald's ω was 0.75, confirming its good internal consistency. The scale's convergent validity was demonstrated through correlations with AFPQ-H and WHOQOL-BREF subscale scores.
conclusionsThe POP-SS-H is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of prolapse-related symptoms. Its high degrees of test-retest reliability and internal consistency make it suitable for clinical follow-up and research. The tool addresses a significant gap in pelvic-floor disorder management in Hungary, although further research is recommended to assess its sensitivity in the tracking of symptom changes after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.