Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Treatment Maneuvers in Cupulolithiasis of the Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of repositioning maneuvers for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Revisiting BPPV: Incidence and Behavior of Atypical Variants.Audiology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Head-shaking and mastoid oscillation maneuvers effectively treat cupulolithiasis of horizontal canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. However, to date there are no validated treatments for cupulolithiasis of posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PC-BPPV-cu). Objective: To determine the immediate and short-term therapeutic efficacy of head-shaking and mastoid oscillation maneuvers in PC-BPPV-cu. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted at 6 referral-based university hospitals in South Korea between November 1, 2019, and April 30, 2023. The inclusion criteria consisted of (1) repetitive episodes of positional vertigo or dizziness; (2) positional nystagmus beating torsionally with the upper pole of the eye to the lower ear and vertically upward (to the forehead) and lasting longer than 1 minute, which was evoked by Dix-Hallpike or half Dix-Hallpike maneuver; and (3) absence of accompanying neurologic symptoms or signs suggesting central nervous system disorders. Patients were excluded who declined to participate or had cervical spine problems, multicanal BPPV, or cognitive dysfunction. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to the head-shaking, mastoid oscillation, or sham maneuver groups. After a maximum of 2 trials of each maneuver, therapeutic response was assessed within 30 minutes and the following day. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the short-term resolution rate of positional vertigo and nystagmus the following day. The secondary outcome was the immediate efficacy of 2 trials of each maneuver within 30 minutes. Results: A total of 159 patients were included in the analysis (108 [67.9%] women; mean [SD] age, 65.4 [10.5] years). Fifty-three participants were randomized to the head-shaking group (mean [SD] age, 64.0 [11.2] years; 33 [62.3%] women), 53 to the mastoid oscillation group (mean [SD], age, 66.5 [11.1] years; 41 [77.4%] women), and 53 to the control group (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [9.2] years; 34 [64.2%] women). A total of 142 patients (89.3%) completed the assessment the following day. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 20 patients in the head-shaking group (37.7%), 14 in the mastoid oscillation group (26.4%), and 7 in the control group (13.2%) showed the resolution of vertigo and nystagmus the following day (χ2 = 8.40; odds ratio, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.32-6.18; P = .004; α = .0167). For the secondary outcome (the immediate effectiveness of 2 trials of each maneuver compared with sham within 30 minutes), no significant difference was detected (6 of 53 [11.3%] vs 4 of 53 [7.5%] vs 2 of 53 [3.8%]; P = .34; α = .05). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the head-shaking maneuver was effective in the treatment of PC-BPPV-cu. Trial Registration: CRIS clinical trial registration: KCT0004756.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.